ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 47524Airport noise and access restriction review program

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 1,057 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Airports that want to restrict older, stage 2 aircraft must publish a cost-benefit analysis and alternatives 180 days ahead of time. New restrictions on newer, stage 3 aircraft need either agreement from every operator or the Secretary's approval, based on evidence the restriction is fair, doesn't burden commerce or safety, and got public comment. Older agreements and certain court-related restrictions are exempt, but an airport with an unapproved stage 3 restriction risks losing federal grants and the right to charge passenger fees.

(a) General Requirements. The national aviation noise policy established under section 47523 must provide for a national program, set by regulation, for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft. The program must provide adequate public notice and a chance to comment on proposed restrictions. (b) Stage 2 Aircraft. Except as subsection (d) provides, an airport noise or access restriction on stage 2 aircraft proposed after October 1, 1990, may take effect only if the airport operator publishes the proposed restriction and, at least 180 days before its effective date, makes available for public comment (1) an analysis of the restriction's anticipated or actual costs and benefits; (2) a description of alternative restrictions; (3) a description of alternative measures that don't involve aircraft restrictions; and (4) a comparison of the costs and benefits of those alternatives to the proposed restriction. (c) Stage 3 Aircraft. (1) Except as subsection (d) provides, a restriction on stage 3 aircraft not already in effect on October 1, 1990, may take effect only if the airport proprietor and all aircraft operators have agreed to it, or it has been submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation after a request under the program established by this section. Covered restrictions include (A) limits on noise levels, whether per event or cumulative; (B) limits on the total number of stage 3 operations; (C) a noise budget or allocation program covering stage 3 aircraft; (D) limits on hours of operation; and (E) any other restriction on stage 3 aircraft. (2) Within 180 days of receiving a request for approval, the Secretary must approve or disapprove the restriction, and may approve it only with substantial evidence that it (A) is reasonable, nonarbitrary, and nondiscriminatory; (B) doesn't create an unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce; (C) is consistent with the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace; (D) doesn't conflict with federal law or regulation; (E) followed adequate public comment procedures; and (F) doesn't create an unreasonable burden on the national aviation system. (3) Paragraphs (1) and (2) don't apply if, before November 5, 1990, the FAA Administrator had already formed a working group — outside the usual part 150 process — with a local airport operator to examine the noise impact of air traffic control changes; but if the airport proprietor and a majority of the airport's carriers later reach a noise-reduction agreement, this paragraph applies only to local enforcement of that agreement. (4) The Secretary may reevaluate an approved or agreed-to restriction if an aircraft operator demonstrates that a change in the airport's noise environment justifies it. The Secretary must set procedures for reevaluation by regulation; a reevaluation must use the criteria in paragraph (2) and can happen only after 2 years have passed since the original decision. (d) Nonapplication. Subsections (b) and (c) don't apply to (1) local action to enforce a negotiated or executed noise or access agreement already in effect on November 5, 1990; (2) local action to enforce a restriction the airport operator and aircraft operators agreed to before that date; (3) an intergovernmental agreement including a restriction already in effect on that date; (4) a later amendment to such an agreement or restriction that doesn't reduce or limit aircraft operations or affect safety; (5)(A) a restriction an airport adopted by October 1, 1990, that a court had stayed as of that date, if a court later allows any part of it to take effect, or (B) a new restriction replacing any part a court disallows, as long as it wouldn't prohibit operations that were in effect on November 5, 1990; or (6) the final stage of a staged restriction program if the initial stage was adopted in 1988 and was still in effect on November 5, 1990. (e) Grant Limitations. Starting on the 91st day after the Secretary prescribes the regulation under subsection (a), an airport operating under a stage 3 noise or access restriction that first became effective after October 1, 1990, is eligible for a grant under section 47104 and eligible to impose a passenger facility charge under section 40117 only if the restriction has been (1) agreed to by the airport proprietor and aircraft operators; (2) approved by the Secretary as required by subsection (c)(1); or (3) rescinded.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)General Requirements.—

The national aviation noise policy established under section 47523 of this title shall provide for establishing by regulation a national program for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft. The program shall provide for adequate public notice and opportunity for comment on the restrictions.

(b)Stage 2 Aircraft.—

Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, an airport noise or access restriction may include a restriction on the operation of stage 2 aircraft proposed after October 1, 1990, only if the airport operator publishes the proposed restriction and prepares and makes available for public comment at least 180 days before the effective date of the proposed restriction—

(1)

an analysis of the anticipated or actual costs and benefits of the existing or proposed restriction;

(2)

a description of alternative restrictions;

(3)

a description of the alternative measures considered that do not involve aircraft restrictions; and

(4)

a comparison of the costs and benefits of the alternative measures to the costs and benefits of the proposed restriction.

(c)Stage 3 Aircraft.—
(1)

Except as provided in subsection (d) of this section, an airport noise or access restriction on the operation of stage 3 aircraft not in effect on October 1, 1990, may become effective only if the restriction has been agreed to by the airport proprietor and all aircraft operators or has been submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation after an airport or aircraft operator’s request for approval as provided by the program established under this section. Restrictions to which this paragraph applies include—

(A)

a restriction on noise levels generated on either a single event or cumulative basis;

(B)

a restriction on the total number of stage 3 aircraft operations;

(C)

a noise budget or noise allocation program that would include stage 3 aircraft;

(D)

a restriction on hours of operations; and

(E)

any other restriction on stage 3 aircraft.

(2)

Not later than 180 days after the Secretary receives an airport or aircraft operator’s request for approval of an airport noise or access restriction on the operation of a stage 3 aircraft, the Secretary shall approve or disapprove the restriction. The Secretary may approve the restriction only if the Secretary finds on the basis of substantial evidence that—

(A)

the restriction is reasonable, nonarbitrary, and nondiscriminatory;

(B)

the restriction does not create an unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce;

(C)

the restriction is not inconsistent with maintaining the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace;

(D)

the restriction does not conflict with a law or regulation of the United States;

(E)

an adequate opportunity has been provided for public comment on the restriction; and

(F)

the restriction does not create an unreasonable burden on the national aviation system.

(3)

Paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection do not apply if the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, before November 5, 1990, has formed a working group (outside the process established by part 150 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations) with a local airport operator to examine the noise impact of air traffic control procedure changes at the airport. However, if an agreement on noise reductions at that airport is made between the airport proprietor and one or more air carriers or foreign air carriers that constitute a majority of the carrier use of the airport, this paragraph applies only to a local action to enforce the agreement.

(4)

The Secretary may reevaluate an airport noise or access restriction previously agreed to or approved under this subsection on request of an aircraft operator able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary that there has been a change in the noise environment of the affected airport that justifies a reevaluation. The Secretary shall establish by regulation procedures for conducting a reevaluation. A reevaluation—

(A)

shall be based on the criteria in paragraph (2) of this subsection; and

(B)

may be conducted only after 2 years after a decision under paragraph (2) of this subsection has been made.

(d)Nonapplication.—

Subsections (b) and (c) of this section do not apply to—

(1)

a local action to enforce a negotiated or executed airport noise or access agreement between the airport operator and the aircraft operators in effect on November 5, 1990;

(2)

a local action to enforce a negotiated or executed airport noise or access restriction agreed to by the airport operator and the aircraft operators before November 5, 1990;

(3)

an intergovernmental agreement including an airport noise or access restriction in effect on November 5, 1990;

(4)

a subsequent amendment to an airport noise or access agreement or restriction in effect on November 5, 1990, that does not reduce or limit aircraft operations or affect aircraft safety;

(5)
(A)

an airport noise or access restriction adopted by an airport operator not later than October 1, 1990, and stayed as of October 1, 1990, by a court order or as a result of litigation, if any part of the restriction is subsequently allowed by a court to take effect; or

(B)

a new restriction imposed by an airport operator to replace any part of a restriction described in subclause (A) of this clause that is disallowed by a court, if the new restriction would not prohibit aircraft operations in effect on November 5, 1990; or

(6)

a local action that represents the adoption of the final part of a program of a staged airport noise or access restriction if the initial part of the program was adopted during 1988 and was in effect on November 5, 1990.

(e)Grant Limitations.—

Beginning on the 91st day after the Secretary prescribes a regulation under subsection (a) of this section, a sponsor of a facility operating under an airport noise or access restriction on the operation of stage 3 aircraft that first became effective after October 1, 1990, is eligible for a grant under section 47104 of this title and is eligible to impose a passenger facility charge under section 40117 of this title only if the restriction has been—

(1)

agreed to by the airport proprietor and aircraft operators;

(2)

approved by the Secretary as required by subsection (c)(1) of this section; or

(3)

rescinded.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1288; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, § 111(c)(2)(A)(vii), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 18.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 1288
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-95 · 126 Stat. 18

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case