ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

5 U.S.C. § 8959 — Preemption

submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-496 to r/title-5-GOVERNMENT-ORGANIZATION-AND-EMPLOYEES · 46 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section makes contract terms about dental coverage and benefits override conflicting State or local laws and regulations.

The terms of any contract that relate to the nature, provision, or extent of coverage or benefits (including payments for benefits) must supersede and preempt any State or local law, or any regulation issued under it, which relates to dental benefits, insurance, plans, or contracts.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The terms of any contract that relate to the nature, provision, or extent of coverage or benefits (including payments with respect to benefits) shall supersede and preempt any State or local law, or any regulation issued thereunder, which relates to dental benefits, insurance, plans, or contracts.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–496, § 2, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 4005.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-496 · 118 Stat. 4005

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-496 on 2004-12-23.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case