ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

5 U.S.C. § 8985 — Information to individuals eligible to enroll

submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-496 to r/title-5-GOVERNMENT-ORGANIZATION-AND-EMPLOYEES · 85 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section requires qualified companies and the Office to provide eligible people information needed to choose vision coverage, including benefits, limits, exclusions, and chapter 89 services.

(a) The qualified companies at the direction and with the approval of the Office, must provide to each person eligible to enroll in a vision benefits plan information on services and benefits (including maximums, limitations, and exclusions), that the Office considers necessary to enable the person to make an informed decision about electing coverage. (b) The Office must provide to each person eligible to enroll in a vision benefits plan, information on services and benefits provided by qualified companies participating under chapter 89.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

The qualified companies at the direction and with the approval of the Office, shall make available to each individual eligible to enroll in a vision benefits plan information on services and benefits (including maximums, limitations, and exclusions), that the Office considers necessary to enable the individual to make an informed decision about electing coverage.

(b)

The Office shall make available to each individual eligible to enroll in a vision benefits plan, information on services and benefits provided by qualified companies participating under chapter 89.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–496, § 3, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 4008.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-496 · 118 Stat. 4008

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-496 on 2004-12-23.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case