ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

54 U.S.C. § 101916 — Reasonableness of rates and charges

submitted 12 years ago by Pub. L. 113-287 to r/title-54-NATIONAL-PARK-SERVICE-AND-RELATED-PROGRAMS · 272 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Park concessioners can set their own prices, but the Secretary must approve them as reasonable. Prices are compared to similar businesses elsewhere and can't be higher than the market rate.

(a) In General. A concession contract must let the concessioner set its own reasonable and appropriate rates and charges for the facilities, goods, and services it sells to the public — but those rates need approval under subsection (b).

(b) Approval by Secretary Required. (1) The Secretary must approve a concessioner's rates and charges. This approval process should be as quick and unburdensome as possible, and should rely on market forces as much as practical. The Secretary approves whatever rates are found reasonable and appropriate. Unless the contract says otherwise, reasonableness is judged mainly by comparing the rates to similar facilities, goods, and services offered under similar conditions — considering factors like: how long the season runs; peak demand periods; the average occupancy rate; how accessible the location is; the cost and availability of labor and materials; and the type of customers served, plus any other factor the Secretary finds relevant. (2) After weighing those factors, the rates and charges can never be higher than market rates for comparable facilities, goods, and services.

(c) Implementation of Recommendations. Within 6 months of getting rate-and-charge recommendations from the Advisory Board, the Secretary must either put them into practice or explain to Congress why not.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)In General.—

A concession contract shall permit the concessioner to set reasonable and appropriate rates and charges for facilities, goods, and services provided to the public, subject to approval under subsection (b).

(b)Approval by Secretary Required.—
(1)Factors to consider.—

A concessioner’s rates and charges to the public shall be subject to approval by the Secretary. The approval process utilized by the Secretary shall be as prompt and as unburdensome to the concessioner as possible and shall rely on market forces to establish reasonableness of rates and charges to the maximum extent practicable. The Secretary shall approve rates and charges that the Secretary determines to be reasonable and appropriate. Unless otherwise provided in the concession contract, the reasonableness and appropriateness of rates and charges shall be determined primarily by comparison with those rates and charges for facilities, goods, and services of comparable character under similar conditions, with due consideration to the following factors and other factors deemed relevant by the Secretary:

(A)

Length of season.

(B)

Peakloads.

(C)

Average percentage of occupancy.

(D)

Accessibility.

(E)

Availability and costs of labor and materials.

(F)

Type of patronage.

(2)Rates and charges not to exceed market rates and charges.—

Rates and charges may not exceed the market rates and charges for comparable facilities, goods, and services, after taking into account the factors referred to in paragraph (1).

(c)Implementation of Recommendations.—

Not later than 6 months after receiving recommendations from the Advisory Board regarding concessioner rates and charges to the public, the Secretary shall implement the recommendations or report to Congress the reasons for not implementing the recommendations.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 113–287, § 3, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3145.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2014Enacted · Pub. L. 113-287 · 128 Stat. 3145

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 113-287 on 2014-12-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case