6 U.S.C. § 195h — National Urban Security Technology Laboratory
submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 107-296 to r/title-6-DOMESTIC-SECURITY · 200 words · no verdicts yet
The Secretary must name the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory as an official Department laboratory. The lab tests new technology and researches ways to help emergency responders fight terrorism. This section does not change the powers of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office.
The Secretary*, acting through the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall designate the laboratory described in subsection (b) as an additional laboratory pursuant to the authority under section 188(c)(2) of this title. Such laboratory shall be used to test and evaluate emerging technologies and conduct research and development to assist emergency response providers* in preparing for, and protecting against, threats of terrorism.
The laboratory described in this subsection is the laboratory—
known, as of December 27, 2021, as the National Urban Security Technology Laboratory; and
transferred to the Department* pursuant to section 183(1)(E) of this title.
The National Urban Security Technology Laboratory shall—
conduct tests, evaluations, and assessments of current and emerging technologies, including, as appropriate, the cybersecurity of such technologies that can connect to the internet, for emergency* response providers;
act as a technical advisor to emergency response providers; and
carry out other such activities as the Secretary determines appropriate.
Nothing in this section may be construed as affecting in any manner the authorities or responsibilities of the Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office of the Department.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 107–296, title III, § 322, as added Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXIV, § 6406(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2402.)
- 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 107-296 · 135 Stat. 2402
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 107-296 on 2021-12-27.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case