ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

7 U.S.C. § 136w–2Failure by the State to assure enforcement of State pesticide use regulations

submitted 79 years ago by Pub. L. 95-396 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 236 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Administrator sends pesticide-use complaints to the State first. If the State does not act within 30 days, the Administrator can step in. The Administrator can also take back a State's enforcement power if it stays inadequate after warning.

(a) Referral When the Administrator gets a complaint or other information about a significant pesticide use violation, the Administrator sends it to the right State officials to investigate, following this law's rules. If the State has not started proper enforcement action within 30 days, the Administrator may act on the complaint or information, to the extent this law allows. (b) Notice If the Administrator decides that a State with primary enforcement responsibility is not carrying it out — or cannot, because it lacks the legal authority — the Administrator must notify the State. The notice must say which parts of the State's program are inadequate. The State then has 90 days from getting the notice to fix those problems. If the Administrator still finds the State's program inadequate after that, the Administrator may take back some or all of the State's primary enforcement responsibility for pesticide use violations. (c) Construction Neither section 136w–1 nor this section limits the Administrator's own power to enforce this law. This is true whenever the Administrator decides an emergency requires immediate action, and the State authority is unwilling or unable to respond adequately to that emergency.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Referral

Upon receipt of any complaint or other information alleging or indicating a significant violation of the pesticide use provisions of this subchapter, the Administrator shall refer the matter to the appropriate State officials for their investigation of the matter consistent with the requirements of this subchapter. If, within thirty days, the State has not commenced appropriate enforcement action, the Administrator may act upon the complaint or information to the extent authorized under this subchapter.

(b) Notice

Whenever the Administrator determines that a State having primary enforcement responsibility for pesticide use violations is not carrying out (or cannot carry out due to the lack of adequate legal authority) such responsibility, the Administrator shall notify the State. Such notice shall specify those aspects of the administration of the State program that are determined to be inadequate. The State shall have ninety days after receipt of the notice to correct any deficiencies. If after that time the Administrator determines that the State program remains inadequate, the Administrator may rescind, in whole or in part, the State’s primary enforcement responsibility for pesticide use violations.

(c) Construction

Neither section 136w–1 of this title nor this section shall limit the authority of the Administrator to enforce this subchapter, where the Administrator determines that emergency conditions exist that require immediate action on the part of the Administrator and the State authority is unwilling or unable adequately to respond to the emergency.

Source credit: (June 25, 1947, ch. 125, § 27, as added Pub. L. 95–396, § 24(2), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 837; amended Pub. L. 100–532, title VIII, § 801(p), Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2683.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1947Enacted · Pub. L. 95-396 · 92 Stat. 837
  • 1988Amended · Pub. L. 100-532 · 102 Stat. 2683

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 95-396 on 1947-06-25.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case