7 U.S.C. § 3125a–1 — Agricultural and food law research, legal tools, and information
submitted 12 years ago by Pub. L. 113-79 to r/title-7-AGRICULTURE · 96 words · no verdicts yet
This section sets rules about Agricultural and food law research, legal tools, and information. (a) Partnerships The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the National Agricultural Library, must support the dissemination of objective, scholarly, and authoritative agricultural and food law research, legal tools, and information...
(a) Partnerships The Secretary* of Agriculture, acting through the National Agricultural Library, must support the dissemination of objective, scholarly, and authoritative agricultural and food law research, legal tools, and information by entering into cooperative agreements with institutions of higher education* (as defined in section 1001 of title 20 ) that on February 7, 2014 , are carrying out objective programs for research, legal tools, and information in agricultural and food law. (b) Authorization of appropriations There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 and each fiscal year thereafter.
The Secretary* of Agriculture, acting through the National Agricultural Library, shall support the dissemination of objective, scholarly, and authoritative agricultural and food law research, legal tools, and information by entering into cooperative agreements with institutions of higher education* (as defined in section 1001 of title 20) that on February 7, 2014, are carrying out objective programs for research, legal tools, and information in agricultural and food law.
There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2014 and each fiscal year thereafter.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, § 7603, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 911.)
- 2014Enacted · Pub. L. 113-79 · 128 Stat. 911
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 113-79 on 2014-02-07.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case