ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 117Readiness reporting system

submitted 28 years ago by Pub. L. 105-261 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 605 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Defense must build one shared system to measure military readiness. It must track units, training, and infrastructure, and update quickly when readiness changes. No single military branch may run its own separate system.

(a) Required Readiness Reporting System — The Secretary of Defense must build one comprehensive readiness reporting system for the whole Department of Defense. It must measure, accurately and on time, whether the armed forces can carry out: (1) the National Security Strategy the President most recently gave Congress under 50 U.S.C. § 3043; (2) the defense planning guidance the Secretary gives under section 113(g); and (3) the National Military Strategy the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs sets. (b) Readiness Reporting System Characteristics — In building and running the system, the Secretary must make sure: (1) the system and its policies apply the same way across the whole Department, including the Joint Staff and every armed force; (2) it is the one and only authorized readiness system — no military branch may run its own separate version; (3) readiness gets assessed at, or below, the level where forces are actually used; (4) it tracks resources, force posture, and mission-focused capability, plus predicted future changes to those; (5) information stays continually updated — with (A) any change in a unit's or part of a unit's readiness status reported within 24 hours of whatever caused the change, and (B) any change in a training facility's or defense-infrastructure element's readiness status reported within 72 hours; and (6) enough resources exist to keep the system running and reporting changes on those timelines. (c) Capabilities — The Secretary decides what factors the system measures overall, but it must always be able to: (1) measure whether units — both as part of their own armed force and as part of joint forces — can do their assigned missions; (2) measure whether training facilities can produce trained, ready forces for their assigned missions; (3) measure whether defense installations, facilities, and other infrastructure — in the U.S. and abroad — can properly support forces doing their assigned missions; (4) measure serious warfighting gaps in unit capability; (5) measure serious warfighting gaps in training facilities and infrastructure; and (6) measure how often units strip usable parts, supplies, or equipment from one vehicle, ship, or aircraft to make a different one work. (d) Regulations — The Secretary must write regulations to carry out this section. Those regulations must name the official information-technology system used for Department-wide reporting, specifically allow exceptions to using just that one system, and identify which organizations, units, resources, training-establishment elements, and infrastructure elements must report into the system.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Required Readiness Reporting System.—

The Secretary of Defense shall establish a comprehensive readiness reporting system for the Department of Defense. The readiness reporting system shall measure in an objective, accurate, and timely manner the capability of the armed forces to carry out—

(1)

the National Security Strategy prescribed by the President in the most recent annual national security strategy report under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3043);

(2)

the defense planning guidance provided by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 113(g) of this title; and

(3)

the National Military Strategy prescribed by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

(b)Readiness Reporting System Characteristics.—

In establishing and maintaining the readiness reporting system, the Secretary shall ensure—

(1)

that the readiness reporting system and associated policies are applied uniformly throughout the Department of Defense, including between and among the joint staff and each of the armed forces;

(2)

that is the single authoritative readiness reporting system for the Department, and that there shall be no military service specific systems;

(3)

that readiness assessments are accomplished at an organizational level at, or below, the level at which forces are employed;

(4)

that the reporting system include resources information, force posture, and mission centric capability assessments, as well as predicted changes to these attributes;

(5)

that information in the readiness reporting system is continually updated, with (A) any change in the overall readiness status of a unit, or element of a unit, that is required to be reported as part of the readiness reporting system being reported within 24 hours of the event necessitating the change in readiness status, and (B) any change in the overall readiness status of an element of the training establishment or an element of defense infrastructure that is required to be reported as part of the readiness reporting system being reported within 72 hours of the event necessitating the change in readiness status; and

(6)

that sufficient resources are provided to establish and maintain the system so as to allow reporting of changes in readiness status as required by this section.

(c)Capabilities.—

The readiness reporting system shall measure such factors relating to readiness as the Secretary prescribes, except that the system shall include the capability to do each of the following:

(1)

Measure the readiness of units (both as elements of their respective armed force and as elements of joint forces) to conduct their designed and assigned missions.

(2)

Measure the capability of training establishments to provide trained and ready forces for designed and assigned missions.

(3)

Measure the capability of defense installations and facilities and other elements of Department of Defense infrastructure, both in the United States and abroad, to provide appropriate support to forces in the conduct of their designed and assigned missions.

(4)

Measure critical warfighting deficiencies in unit capability.

(5)

Measure critical warfighting deficiencies in training establishments and defense infrastructure.

(6)

Measure the extent to which units of the armed forces remove serviceable parts, supplies, or equipment from one vehicle, vessel, or aircraft in order to render a different vehicle, vessel, or aircraft operational.

(d)Regulations.—

The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. In those regulations, the Secretary shall prescribe the established information technology system for Department of Defense reporting, specifically authorize exceptions to a single-system architecture, and identify the organizations, units, and entities that are subject to reporting in the readiness reporting system, what organization resources are subject to such reporting, and the elements of the training establishment and of defense infrastructure that are subject to such reporting.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title III, § 373(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 1990; amended Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title III, § 361(d)(1), title X, § 1067(1), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 575, 774; Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title III, § 371], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–80; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, § 1031(a)(1), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1595; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title VIII, § 845(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1848; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(c)(2), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3508; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title III, § 331(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1354; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title III, § 331(a)–(g)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1723, 1724; Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title III, § 361(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1325.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1998Enacted · Pub. L. 105-261 · 112 Stat. 1990
  • 1999Amended · Pub. L. 106-65 · 113 Stat. 575, 774
  • 2000Amended · Pub. L. 106-398 · 114 Stat. 1654, 1654
  • 2003Amended · Pub. L. 108-136 · 117 Stat. 1595
  • 2013Amended · Pub. L. 112-239 · 126 Stat. 1848
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3508
  • 2017Amended · Pub. L. 115-91 · 131 Stat. 1354
  • 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-232 · 132 Stat. 1723, 1724
  • 2019Amended · Pub. L. 116-92 · 133 Stat. 1325

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-261 on 1998-10-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case