ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

47 U.S.C. § 227Restrictions on use of telephone equipment

submitted 92 years ago by Pub. L. 102-243 to r/title-47-TELECOMMUNICATIONS · 6,653 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law limits robocalls, text messages, junk faxes, and faked caller ID. It bans most automated or prerecorded calls to cell phones, hospitals, and emergency lines without consent. It also lets the FCC set rules, lets people sue for money damages, and lets state attorneys general sue on behalf of residents.

This section is the main federal law against robocalls, junk faxes, and caller ID spoofing. It has many parts, labeled (a) through (j). (a) Definitions. This part defines key terms used later in the section. An "automatic telephone dialing system" is equipment that can store or produce phone numbers using a random or sequential number generator and then dial them. An "established business relationship" borrows the meaning used in a 2003 FCC rule, but also covers business (not just home) phone subscribers, and can be limited in length by the FCC. A "telephone facsimile machine" is equipment that turns paper into an electronic fax signal, or turns a received fax signal back into paper. A "telephone solicitation" is a call or message trying to get someone to buy, rent, or invest in something — but it does not count if the person invited the call, has an existing business relationship with the caller, or the caller is a tax-exempt nonprofit. An "unsolicited advertisement" is any material advertising goods, property, or services sent to someone who did not ask for it, in writing or otherwise. (b) Restrictions on automated telephone equipment. Paragraph (1) lists what is illegal. Nobody may use an automatic dialing system or a prerecorded/artificial voice to call: emergency lines like 911 or a hospital's emergency line; a patient's or guest's room at a hospital, nursing home, or similar place; or any cell phone, pager, or other line where the person called is charged for the call — unless the call is an emergency, the called party already agreed to it, or the call is solely to collect a debt owed to the federal government. Nobody may use a prerecorded voice to call a home phone without the person's prior consent, unless it's an emergency, a federal debt-collection call, or the FCC has exempted it. Nobody may fax an unsolicited advertisement to a fax machine unless: the sender has an existing business relationship with the recipient; the sender got the fax number directly from the recipient during that relationship, or from a public directory or website where the recipient agreed to share it; and the fax includes an opt-out notice that meets the standards in paragraph (2)(D). That exception disappears if the recipient already asked the sender to stop, using the process in paragraph (2)(E). Finally, nobody may use an automatic dialing system to tie up two or more lines of a multi-line business at once. Paragraph (2) tells the FCC to write rules carrying out these bans. The FCC must consider letting businesses opt out of prerecorded calls they haven't approved. It may exempt non-commercial calls and certain commercial calls from the home-phone prerecorded-voice ban, as long as doing so won't hurt people's privacy and won't include ads. It may exempt free cell phone calls from the automatic-dialer ban, with conditions to protect privacy. It must require that a fax ad's opt-out notice be clear, appear on the first page, explain the recipient's right to stop future faxes, list what a stop request must contain, and give a free phone number, fax number, and other free way to send that request at any time — though small businesses may get relief if the cost is too burdensome. It must make sure a "stop sending" request is valid only if it names the fax number(s), is sent to the sender's listed contact information (or another FCC-approved method), and the recipient hasn't since given new permission. It may let tax-exempt professional or trade associations send unsolicited faxes to their own members without the opt-out notice, but only after public rulemaking and only if the FCC finds the notice isn't needed to protect members. It may limit how long an "established business relationship" lasts, but first must study complaint patterns and costs, and can't start that study until three months after July 9, 2005. It may limit the number and length of federal-debt-collection calls to cell phones. And any exemption for prerecorded calls or cell-phone calls must specify who can make the calls, who can be called, and how many calls are allowed. Paragraph (3) is a private right of action: if state law allows, a person can sue in state court to stop a violation of this subsection, to recover actual money lost or $500 per violation (whichever is more), or both. If the violation was willful or knowing, the court can triple the damages. Paragraph (4) covers civil forfeiture penalties the FCC can impose. A violator owes a forfeiture penalty under the standard FCC penalty process; if the violation was done with intent, the penalty is the standard amount plus up to $10,000 more. These penalties are recoverable in court. No penalty can be imposed without the required notice, and the FCC can't seek a penalty for a violation more than 1 year old (ordinary violations) or more than 4 years old (intentional violations). The FCC can't penalize the same conduct under both the ordinary and the intentional-violation rules at once. (c) Protection of subscriber privacy rights. Paragraph (1) required the FCC, within 120 days after December 20, 1991, to start a rulemaking on protecting home phone subscribers from unwanted telephone solicitations. That rulemaking had to compare options like electronic "do not call" databases and industry systems, look at who could run such a system, consider special rules for local solicitations, decide whether the FCC needed more power to restrict calls (and if so, recommend it to Congress), and propose rules for whatever method works best. Paragraph (2) required the FCC to finish that rulemaking within 9 months after December 20, 1991, and issue rules that protect subscribers efficiently and without charging them extra. Paragraph (3) says those rules may require a single national "do not call" database. If the FCC creates one, the rules must: set how the FCC picks who runs the database; require phone companies to tell subscribers they can register their objection; explain how subscribers learn their rights and how to use them; explain how objections get added to the list; bar charging subscribers for joining or leaving the list; bar telemarketers from calling numbers on the list; explain how telemarketers get access to the list by area code and prefix, and what they pay for it; explain how the database's operating costs are recovered from telemarketers; set how often the database updates; let states plug into the same database for their own law enforcement; limit the database's use to enforcing this law (and matching state laws) and protect the privacy of numbers on it; and require carriers who provide telemarketing services to tell their telemarketing customers about this law. Paragraph (4) says that if the FCC does create the database, it must consider that national, regional, state, and local telemarketers have different needs; build a fee structure reflecting the different costs of national versus local lists and paper versus electronic lists, without unfairly burdening small businesses; and consider whether local telemarketers' needs could be met by special markings in phone books instead. Paragraph (5) gives a private right of action: someone who got more than one call from the same telemarketer in 12 months, in violation of these privacy rules, can sue in state court (if state law allows) to stop the calls, to recover actual losses or up to $500 per violation, or both. It's a defense if the caller shows it had reasonable practices in place to prevent violations. Willful or knowing violations can be tripled by the court. Paragraph (6) makes clear that nothing in subsection (c) allows a call that subsection (b) already bans. (d) Technical and procedural standards. Paragraph (1) makes it illegal to use a fax machine or automatic dialing system that doesn't meet the FCC's technical standards, or to send a fax message without labeling each page (or the first page) with the date, time, sender's identity, and sender's phone number. Paragraph (2) told the FCC to update fax machine standards so that any fax machine made more than a year after December 20, 1991 automatically stamps this same information on each transmitted page. Paragraph (3) told the FCC to set standards for prerecorded-voice call systems: every such message must state, at the start, who is calling, and must state, during or after the message, that caller's phone number or address; and the system must free up the called party's phone line within 5 seconds after the call ends. (e) Prohibition on misleading or inaccurate caller ID information. Paragraph (1) bans knowingly causing a caller ID service to show false or misleading caller ID information, when done to defraud someone, cause harm, or wrongfully get something of value — unless a specific exemption applies. Paragraph (2) protects the right to simply block your caller ID from showing at all; that's not covered by the ban. Paragraph (3) tells the FCC to write exemption rules, which must include exemptions for authorized law enforcement activity and for actions specifically authorized by a court order. Paragraph (4) has been repealed. Paragraph (5) sets penalties. Civil forfeiture: a violator owes up to $10,000 per violation, or 3 times that per day for a continuing violation, capped at $1,000,000 total for a single violation or failure; penalties are collected in court, require prior notice, and can't be assessed for violations more than 4 years old. Criminal fine: someone who willfully and knowingly violates this rule can be fined up to $10,000 per violation (or 3 times that per day), instead of a different fine that would otherwise apply — but this doesn't remove any risk of prison time. Paragraph (6) lets a state's chief legal officer sue in federal court, on behalf of the state's residents, to enforce this rule, after giving the FCC notice (in advance if possible). The FCC can then step into that lawsuit, be heard, and appeal. This doesn't stop the state officer from also using their normal state investigative powers. The suit must be filed in a proper federal court, and people involved in the violation can be served and joined regardless of where they live. Paragraph (7) says this ban doesn't stop lawful law enforcement or intelligence investigations. Paragraph (8) defines terms used in subsection (e): "caller identification information" is the phone number or origin information a caller ID service shows for a call or text; "caller identification service" is any service or device that provides that information, including automatic number identification; "text message" means a message of text, images, or sounds sent to or from a device identified by a 10-digit phone number or short code, including SMS and MMS, but not real-time voice/video calls or messages sent within the same app between users of that app; "text messaging service" is a service that sends or receives text messages; "voice service" is a service connected to the regular phone network that carries voice calls using standard phone numbers, including fax transmissions. Paragraph (9) says subsection (f) — the state-law-preemption rule — does not apply to this subsection (e) or its regulations. (f) Effect on state law. Paragraph (1) says that, except for the technical standards in subsection (d), this section does not stop states from having stricter rules against junk faxes, automatic dialers, prerecorded voice messages, or telephone solicitations. Paragraph (2) says that if the FCC creates a single national "do not call" database, a state or local government can't require telemarketers to use a different database that leaves out that state's portion of the national one. (g) Actions by states. Paragraph (1) lets a state's attorney general (or a state-designated official) sue on behalf of residents when the state believes someone is engaged in a pattern of calls violating this section. The state can sue to stop the calls, to recover actual losses or $500 per violation, or both; a willful or knowing violation lets the court triple the award. Paragraph (2) gives federal district courts exclusive power to hear these state lawsuits, including the power to order compliance and issue injunctions without requiring a bond. Paragraph (3) requires the state to notify the FCC of the lawsuit in advance (or immediately if advance notice isn't possible) and lets the FCC intervene, be heard, and appeal. Paragraph (4) sets venue: the suit can be filed where the defendant is located, does business, or where the violation happened, and process can be served wherever the defendant can be found. Paragraph (5) confirms the state keeps its normal investigative powers, like issuing oaths or compelling witnesses, when bringing this kind of suit. Paragraph (6) says nothing here stops a state official from separately prosecuting under the state's own general civil or criminal laws. Paragraph (7) says that once the FCC has sued someone over these rules, no state can sue that same defendant for the same violations while the FCC's case is still pending. Paragraph (8) defines "attorney general," for this subsection, as the state's chief legal officer. (h) Annual report to Congress on robocalls and caller ID abuse. Starting one year after December 30, 2019, and every year after, the FCC must report to Congress on how it enforced subsections (b) through (e) that year. Each report must include: the number of complaints in each of the last five years about violations of subsections (b)/(c), of the technical standards in (d), and of the caller-ID rule in (e); how many citations the FCC issued to enforce subsection (d); how many notices of likely liability the FCC issued to enforce (b) through (e), and the proposed penalty in each; how many final forfeiture orders were issued, and the amount in each; how much money in penalties or fines was actually collected, and details of each case; ideas for cutting down illegal robocalls; and an analysis of how internet-based phone providers that offer cheap, high-volume, short calls contribute to illegal robocalls, with recommendations to address it. The FCC must build this report without asking phone or voice-service providers for extra information beyond what it already collects. (i) Information sharing. Within 18 months after December 30, 2019, the FCC must create a streamlined process letting private companies voluntarily share information about calls or texts that violate subsection (b), or calls or texts using faked caller ID that violate subsection (e). The term "text message" here has the same meaning given in subsection (e). (j) Robocall blocking service. Within 1 year after December 30, 2019, the FCC had to take final action ensuring that robocall-blocking services offered on an opt-in or opt-out basis (as described in the FCC's 2019 declaratory ruling) give both consumers and callers clear information and a real way to fix problems; don't add extra charges to consumers or callers for fixing wrongly-blocked calls; and make every reasonable effort not to block emergency public-safety calls. The term "text message" here again has the meaning given in subsection (e). The text notes stray footnote markers ("1", "2") that are not part of the substance and are ignored here.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1)

The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A)

to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and

(B)

to dial such numbers.

(2)

The term “established business relationship”, for purposes only of subsection (b)(1)(C)(i), shall have the meaning given the term in section 64.1200 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 2003, except that—

(A)

such term shall include a relationship between a person or entity and a business subscriber subject to the same terms applicable under such section to a relationship between a person or entity and a residential subscriber; and

(B)

an established business relationship shall be subject to any time limitation established pursuant to paragraph (2)(G)).1

(3)

The term “telephone facsimile machine” means equipment which has the capacity (A) to transcribe text or images, or both, from paper into an electronic signal and to transmit that signal over a regular telephone line, or (B) to transcribe text or images (or both) from an electronic signal received over a regular telephone line onto paper.

(4)

The term “telephone solicitation” means the initiation of a telephone call or message for the purpose of encouraging the purchase or rental of, or investment in, property, goods, or services, which is transmitted to any person, but such term does not include a call or message (A) to any person with that person’s prior express invitation or permission, (B) to any person with whom the caller has an established business relationship, or (C) by a tax exempt nonprofit organization.

(5)

The term “unsolicited advertisement” means any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without that person’s prior express invitation or permission, in writing or otherwise.

(b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
(1) Prohibitions

It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States—

(A)

to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice—

(i)

to any emergency telephone line (including any “911” line and any emergency line of a hospital, medical physician or service office, health care facility, poison control center, or fire protection or law enforcement agency);

(ii)

to the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of a hospital, health care facility, elderly home, or similar establishment; or

(iii)

to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call, unless such call is made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States;

(B)

to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes, is made solely pursuant to the collection of a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, or is exempted by rule or order by the Commission under paragraph (2)(B);

(C)

to use any telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an unsolicited advertisement, unless—

(i)

the unsolicited advertisement is from a sender with an established business relationship with the recipient;

(ii)

the sender obtained the number of the telephone facsimile machine through—

(I)

the voluntary communication of such number, within the context of such established business relationship, from the recipient of the unsolicited advertisement, or

(II)

a directory, advertisement, or site on the Internet to which the recipient voluntarily agreed to make available its facsimile number for public distribution,

 except that this clause shall not apply in the case of an unsolicited advertisement that is sent based on an established business relationship with the recipient that was in existence before July 9, 2005, if the sender possessed the facsimile machine number of the recipient before July 9, 2005; and

(iii)

the unsolicited advertisement contains a notice meeting the requirements under paragraph (2)(D),

except that the exception under clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply with respect to an unsolicited advertisement sent to a telephone facsimile machine by a sender to whom a request has been made not to send future unsolicited advertisements to such telephone facsimile machine that complies with the requirements under paragraph (2)(E); or

(D)

to use an automatic telephone dialing system in such a way that two or more telephone lines of a multi-line business are engaged simultaneously.

(2) Regulations; exemptions and other provisions

The Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement the requirements of this subsection. In implementing the requirements of this subsection, the Commission—

(A)

shall consider prescribing regulations to allow businesses to avoid receiving calls made using an artificial or prerecorded voice to which they have not given their prior express consent;

(B)

may, by rule or order, exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection, subject to such conditions as the Commission may prescribe—

(i)

calls that are not made for a commercial purpose; and

(ii)

such classes or categories of calls made for commercial purposes as the Commission determines—

(I)

will not adversely affect the privacy rights that this section is intended to protect; and

(II)

do not include the transmission of any unsolicited advertisement;

(C)

may, by rule or order, exempt from the requirements of paragraph (1)(A)(iii) of this subsection calls to a telephone number assigned to a cellular telephone service that are not charged to the called party, subject to such conditions as the Commission may prescribe as necessary in the interest of the privacy rights this section is intended to protect;

(D)

shall provide that a notice contained in an unsolicited advertisement complies with the requirements under this subparagraph only if—

(i)

the notice is clear and conspicuous and on the first page of the unsolicited advertisement;

(ii)

the notice states that the recipient may make a request to the sender of the unsolicited advertisement not to send any future unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile machine or machines and that failure to comply, within the shortest reasonable time, as determined by the Commission, with such a request meeting the requirements under subparagraph (E) is unlawful;

(iii)

the notice sets forth the requirements for a request under subparagraph (E);

(iv)

the notice includes—

(I)

a domestic contact telephone and facsimile machine number for the recipient to transmit such a request to the sender; and

(II)

a cost-free mechanism for a recipient to transmit a request pursuant to such notice to the sender of the unsolicited advertisement; the Commission shall by rule require the sender to provide such a mechanism and may, in the discretion of the Commission and subject to such conditions as the Commission may prescribe, exempt certain classes of small business senders, but only if the Commission determines that the costs to such class are unduly burdensome given the revenues generated by such small businesses;

(v)

the telephone and facsimile machine numbers and the cost-free mechanism set forth pursuant to clause (iv) permit an individual or business to make such a request at any time on any day of the week; and

(vi)

the notice complies with the requirements of subsection (d);

(E)

shall provide, by rule, that a request not to send future unsolicited advertisements to a telephone facsimile machine complies with the requirements under this subparagraph only if—

(i)

the request identifies the telephone number or numbers of the telephone facsimile machine or machines to which the request relates;

(ii)

the request is made to the telephone or facsimile number of the sender of such an unsolicited advertisement provided pursuant to subparagraph (D)(iv) or by any other method of communication as determined by the Commission; and

(iii)

the person making the request has not, subsequent to such request, provided express invitation or permission to the sender, in writing or otherwise, to send such advertisements to such person at such telephone facsimile machine;

(F)

may, in the discretion of the Commission and subject to such conditions as the Commission may prescribe, allow professional or trade associations that are tax-exempt nonprofit organizations to send unsolicited advertisements to their members in furtherance of the association’s tax-exempt purpose that do not contain the notice required by paragraph (1)(C)(iii), except that the Commission may take action under this subparagraph only—

(i)

by regulation issued after public notice and opportunity for public comment; and

(ii)

if the Commission determines that such notice required by paragraph (1)(C)(iii) is not necessary to protect the ability of the members of such associations to stop such associations from sending any future unsolicited advertisements;

(G)
(i)

may, consistent with clause (ii), limit the duration of the existence of an established business relationship, however, before establishing any such limits, the Commission shall—

(I)

determine whether the existence of the exception under paragraph (1)(C) relating to an established business relationship has resulted in a significant number of complaints to the Commission regarding the sending of unsolicited advertisements to telephone facsimile machines;

(II)

determine whether a significant number of any such complaints involve unsolicited advertisements that were sent on the basis of an established business relationship that was longer in duration than the Commission believes is consistent with the reasonable expectations of consumers;

(III)

evaluate the costs to senders of demonstrating the existence of an established business relationship within a specified period of time and the benefits to recipients of establishing a limitation on such established business relationship; and

(IV)

determine whether with respect to small businesses, the costs would not be unduly burdensome; and

(ii)

may not commence a proceeding to determine whether to limit the duration of the existence of an established business relationship before the expiration of the 3-month period that begins on July 9, 2005;

(H)

may restrict or limit the number and duration of calls made to a telephone number assigned to a cellular telephone service to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States; and

(I)

shall ensure that any exemption under subparagraph (B) or (C) contains requirements for calls made in reliance on the exemption with respect to—

(i)

the classes of parties that may make such calls;

(ii)

the classes of parties that may be called; and

(iii)

the number of such calls that a calling party may make to a particular called party.

(3) Private right of action

A person or entity may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State, bring in an appropriate court of that State—

(A)

an action based on a violation of this subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection to enjoin such violation,

(B)

an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to receive $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, or

(C)

both such actions.

If the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated this subsection or the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(4) Civil forfeiture
(A) In general

Any person that is determined by the Commission, in accordance with paragraph (3) or (4) of section 503(b) of this title, to have violated this subsection shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty pursuant to section 503(b)(1) of this title. Paragraph (5) of section 503(b) of this title shall not apply in the case of a violation of this subsection. A forfeiture penalty under this subparagraph shall be in addition to any other penalty provided for by this chapter. The amount of the forfeiture penalty determined under this subparagraph shall be determined in accordance with subparagraphs (A) through (F) of section 503(b)(2) of this title.

(B) Violation with intent

Any person that is determined by the Commission, in accordance with paragraph (3) or (4) of section 503(b) of this title, to have violated this subsection with the intent to cause such violation shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty pursuant to section 503(b)(1) of this title. Paragraph (5) of section 503(b) of this title shall not apply in the case of a violation of this subsection. A forfeiture penalty under this subparagraph shall be in addition to any other penalty provided for by this chapter. The amount of the forfeiture penalty determined under this subparagraph shall be equal to an amount determined in accordance with subparagraphs (A) through (F) of section 503(b)(2) of this title plus an additional penalty not to exceed $10,000.

(C) Recovery

Any forfeiture penalty determined under subparagraph (A) or (B) shall be recoverable under section 504(a) of this title.

(D) Procedure

No forfeiture liability shall be determined under subparagraph (A) or (B) against any person unless such person receives the notice required by section 503(b)(3) of this title or section 503(b)(4) of this title.

(E) Statute of limitations

Notwithstanding paragraph (6) of section 503(b) of this title, no forfeiture penalty shall be determined or imposed against any person—

(i)

under subparagraph (A) if the violation charged occurred more than 1 year prior to the date of issuance of the required notice or notice of apparent liability; or

(ii)

under subparagraph (B) if the violation charged occurred more than 4 years prior to the date of issuance of the required notice or notice of apparent liability.

(F) Rule of construction

Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, the Commission may not determine or impose a forfeiture penalty on a person under both subparagraphs (A) and (B) based on the same conduct.

(c) Protection of subscriber privacy rights
(1) Rulemaking proceeding required

Within 120 days after December 20, 1991, the Commission shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding concerning the need to protect residential telephone subscribers’ privacy rights to avoid receiving telephone solicitations to which they object. The proceeding shall—

(A)

compare and evaluate alternative methods and procedures (including the use of electronic databases, telephone network technologies, special directory markings, industry-based or company-specific “do not call” systems, and any other alternatives, individually or in combination) for their effectiveness in protecting such privacy rights, and in terms of their cost and other advantages and disadvantages;

(B)

evaluate the categories of public and private entities that would have the capacity to establish and administer such methods and procedures;

(C)

consider whether different methods and procedures may apply for local telephone solicitations, such as local telephone solicitations of small businesses or holders of second class mail permits;

(D)

consider whether there is a need for additional Commission authority to further restrict telephone solicitations, including those calls exempted under subsection (a)(3) of this section, and, if such a finding is made and supported by the record, propose specific restrictions to the Congress; and

(E)

develop proposed regulations to implement the methods and procedures that the Commission determines are most effective and efficient to accomplish the purposes of this section.

(2) Regulations

Not later than 9 months after December 20, 1991, the Commission shall conclude the rulemaking proceeding initiated under paragraph (1) and shall prescribe regulations to implement methods and procedures for protecting the privacy rights described in such paragraph in an efficient, effective, and economic manner and without the imposition of any additional charge to telephone subscribers.

(3) Use of database permitted

The regulations required by paragraph (2) may require the establishment and operation of a single national database to compile a list of telephone numbers of residential subscribers who object to receiving telephone solicitations, and to make that compiled list and parts thereof available for purchase. If the Commission determines to require such a database, such regulations shall—

(A)

specify a method by which the Commission will select an entity to administer such database;

(B)

require each common carrier providing telephone exchange service, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Commission, to inform subscribers for telephone exchange service of the opportunity to provide notification, in accordance with regulations established under this paragraph, that such subscriber objects to receiving telephone solicitations;

(C)

specify the methods by which each telephone subscriber shall be informed, by the common carrier that provides local exchange service to that subscriber, of (i) the subscriber’s right to give or revoke a notification of an objection under subparagraph (A), and (ii) the methods by which such right may be exercised by the subscriber;

(D)

specify the methods by which such objections shall be collected and added to the database;

(E)

prohibit any residential subscriber from being charged for giving or revoking such notification or for being included in a database compiled under this section;

(F)

prohibit any person from making or transmitting a telephone solicitation to the telephone number of any subscriber included in such database;

(G)

specify (i) the methods by which any person desiring to make or transmit telephone solicitations will obtain access to the database, by area code or local exchange prefix, as required to avoid calling the telephone numbers of subscribers included in such database; and (ii) the costs to be recovered from such persons;

(H)

specify the methods for recovering, from persons accessing such database, the costs involved in identifying, collecting, updating, disseminating, and selling, and other activities relating to, the operations of the database that are incurred by the entities carrying out those activities;

(I)

specify the frequency with which such database will be updated and specify the method by which such updating will take effect for purposes of compliance with the regulations prescribed under this subsection;

(J)

be designed to enable States to use the database mechanism selected by the Commission for purposes of administering or enforcing State law;

(K)

prohibit the use of such database for any purpose other than compliance with the requirements of this section and any such State law and specify methods for protection of the privacy rights of persons whose numbers are included in such database; and

(L)

require each common carrier providing services to any person for the purpose of making telephone solicitations to notify such person of the requirements of this section and the regulations thereunder.

(4) Considerations required for use of database method

If the Commission determines to require the database mechanism described in paragraph (3), the Commission shall—

(A)

in developing procedures for gaining access to the database, consider the different needs of telemarketers conducting business on a national, regional, State, or local level;

(B)

develop a fee schedule or price structure for recouping the cost of such database that recognizes such differences and—

(i)

reflect the relative costs of providing a national, regional, State, or local list of phone numbers of subscribers who object to receiving telephone solicitations;

(ii)

reflect the relative costs of providing such lists on paper or electronic media; and

(iii)

not place an unreasonable financial burden on small businesses; and

(C)

consider (i) whether the needs of telemarketers operating on a local basis could be met through special markings of area white pages directories, and (ii) if such directories are needed as an adjunct to database lists prepared by area code and local exchange prefix.

(5) Private right of action

A person who has received more than one telephone call within any 12-month period by or on behalf of the same entity in violation of the regulations prescribed under this subsection may, if otherwise permitted by the laws or rules of court of a State bring in an appropriate court of that State—

(A)

an action based on a violation of the regulations prescribed under this subsection to enjoin such violation,

(B)

an action to recover for actual monetary loss from such a violation, or to receive up to $500 in damages for each such violation, whichever is greater, or

(C)

both such actions.

It shall be an affirmative defense in any action brought under this paragraph that the defendant has established and implemented, with due care, reasonable practices and procedures to effectively prevent telephone solicitations in violation of the regulations prescribed under this subsection. If the court finds that the defendant willfully or knowingly violated the regulations prescribed under this subsection, the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(6) Relation to subsection (b)

The provisions of this subsection shall not be construed to permit a communication prohibited by subsection (b).

(d) Technical and procedural standards
(1) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States—

(A)

to initiate any communication using a telephone facsimile machine, or to make any telephone call using any automatic telephone dialing system, that does not comply with the technical and procedural standards prescribed under this subsection, or to use any telephone facsimile machine or automatic telephone dialing system in a manner that does not comply with such standards; or

(B)

to use a computer or other electronic device to send any message via a telephone facsimile machine unless such person clearly marks, in a margin at the top or bottom of each transmitted page of the message or on the first page of the transmission, the date and time it is sent and an identification of the business, other entity, or individual sending the message and the telephone number of the sending machine or of such business, other entity, or individual.

(2) Telephone facsimile machines

The Commission shall revise the regulations setting technical and procedural standards for telephone facsimile machines to require that any such machine which is manufactured after one year after December 20, 1991, clearly marks, in a margin at the top or bottom of each transmitted page or on the first page of each transmission, the date and time sent, an identification of the business, other entity, or individual sending the message, and the telephone number of the sending machine or of such business, other entity, or individual.

(3) Artificial or prerecorded voice systems

The Commission shall prescribe technical and procedural standards for systems that are used to transmit any artificial or prerecorded voice message via telephone. Such standards shall require that—

(A)

all artificial or prerecorded telephone messages (i) shall, at the beginning of the message, state clearly the identity of the business, individual, or other entity initiating the call, and (ii) shall, during or after the message, state clearly the telephone number or address of such business, other entity, or individual; and

(B)

any such system will automatically release the called party’s line within 5 seconds of the time notification is transmitted to the system that the called party has hung up, to allow the called party’s line to be used to make or receive other calls.

(e) Prohibition on provision of misleading or inaccurate caller identification information
(1) In general

It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States, in connection with any voice service or text messaging service, to cause any caller identification service to knowingly transmit misleading or inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value, unless such transmission is exempted pursuant to paragraph (3)(B).

(2) Protection for blocking caller identification information

Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent or restrict any person from blocking the capability of any caller identification service to transmit caller identification information.

(3) Regulations
(A) In general

The Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement this subsection.

(B) Content of regulations
(i) In general

The regulations required under subparagraph (A) shall include such exemptions from the prohibition under paragraph (1) as the Commission determines is appropriate.

(ii) Specific exemption for law enforcement agencies or court orders

The regulations required under subparagraph (A) shall exempt from the prohibition under paragraph (1) transmissions in connection with—

(I)

any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency; or

(II)

a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation.

(4) Repealed. Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title IV, § 402(i)(3), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1089

(5) Penalties
(A) Civil forfeiture
(i) In general

Any person that is determined by the Commission, in accordance with paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 503(b) of this title, to have violated this subsection shall be liable to the United States for a forfeiture penalty. A forfeiture penalty under this paragraph shall be in addition to any other penalty provided for by this chapter. The amount of the forfeiture penalty determined under this paragraph shall not exceed $10,000 for each violation, or 3 times that amount for each day of a continuing violation, except that the amount assessed for any continuing violation shall not exceed a total of $1,000,000 for any single act or failure to act.

(ii) Recovery

Any forfeiture penalty determined under clause (i) shall be recoverable pursuant to section 504(a) of this title. Paragraph (5) of section 503(b) of this title shall not apply in the case of a violation of this subsection.

(iii) Procedure

No forfeiture liability shall be determined under clause (i) against any person unless such person receives the notice required by section 503(b)(3) of this title or section 503(b)(4) of this title.

(iv) 4-year statute of limitations

No forfeiture penalty shall be determined or imposed against any person under clause (i) if the violation charged occurred more than 4 years prior to the date of issuance of the required notice or notice or apparent liability.

(B) Criminal fine

Any person who willfully and knowingly violates this subsection shall upon conviction thereof be fined not more than $10,000 for each violation, or 3 times that amount for each day of a continuing violation, in lieu of the fine provided by section 501 of this title for such a violation. This subparagraph does not supersede the provisions of section 501 of this title relating to imprisonment or the imposition of a penalty of both fine and imprisonment.

(6) Enforcement by States
(A) In general

The chief legal officer of a State, or any other State officer authorized by law to bring actions on behalf of the residents of a State, may bring a civil action, as parens patriae, on behalf of the residents of that State in an appropriate district court of the United States to enforce this subsection or to impose the civil penalties for violation of this subsection, whenever the chief legal officer or other State officer has reason to believe that the interests of the residents of the State have been or are being threatened or adversely affected by a violation of this subsection or a regulation under this subsection.

(B) Notice

The chief legal officer or other State officer shall serve written notice on the Commission of any civil action under subparagraph (A) prior to initiating such civil action. The notice shall include a copy of the complaint to be filed to initiate such civil action, except that if it is not feasible for the State to provide such prior notice, the State shall provide such notice immediately upon instituting such civil action.

(C) Authority to intervene

Upon receiving the notice required by subparagraph (B), the Commission shall have the right—

(i)

to intervene in the action;

(ii)

upon so intervening, to be heard on all matters arising therein; and

(iii)

to file petitions for appeal.

(D) Construction

For purposes of bringing any civil action under subparagraph (A), nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the chief legal officer or other State officer from exercising the powers conferred on that officer by the laws of such State to conduct investigations or to administer oaths or affirmations or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence.

(E) Venue; service or process
(i) Venue

An action brought under subparagraph (A) shall be brought in a district court of the United States that meets applicable requirements relating to venue under section 1391 of title 28.

(ii) Service of process

In an action brought under subparagraph (A)—

(I)

process may be served without regard to the territorial limits of the district or of the State in which the action is instituted; and

(II)

a person who participated in an alleged violation that is being litigated in the civil action may be joined in the civil action without regard to the residence of the person.

(7) Effect on other laws

This subsection does not prohibit any lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity of a law enforcement agency of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State, or of an intelligence agency of the United States.

(8) Definitions

For purposes of this subsection:

(A) Caller identification information

The term “caller identification information” means information provided by a caller identification service regarding the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of, a call made using a voice service or a text message sent using a text messaging service.

(B) Caller identification service

The term “caller identification service” means any service or device designed to provide the user of the service or device with the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of, a call made using a voice service or a text message sent using a text messaging service. Such term includes automatic number identification services.

(C) Text message

The term “text message”—

(i)

means a message consisting of text, images, sounds, or other information that is transmitted to or from a device that is identified as the receiving or transmitting device by means of a 10-digit telephone number or N11 service code;

(ii)

includes a short message service (commonly referred to as “SMS”) message and a multimedia message service (commonly referred to as “MMS”) message; and

(iii)

does not include—

(I)

a real-time, two-way voice or video communication; or

(II)

a message sent over an IP-enabled messaging service to another user of the same messaging service, except a message described in clause (ii).

(D) Text messaging service

The term “text messaging service” means a service that enables the transmission or receipt of a text message, including a service provided as part of or in connection with a voice service.

(E) Voice service

The term “voice service”—

(i)

means any service that is interconnected with the public switched telephone network and that furnishes voice communications to an end user using resources from the North American Numbering Plan or any successor to the North American Numbering Plan adopted by the Commission under section 251(e)(1) of this title; and

(ii)

includes transmissions from a telephone facsimile machine, computer, or other device to a telephone facsimile machine.

(9) Limitation

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, subsection (f) shall not apply to this subsection or to the regulations under this subsection.

(f) Effect on State law
(1) State law not preempted

Except for the standards prescribed under subsection (d) and subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, nothing in this section or in the regulations prescribed under this section shall preempt any State law that imposes more restrictive intrastate requirements or regulations on, or which prohibits—

(A)

the use of telephone facsimile machines or other electronic devices to send unsolicited advertisements;

(B)

the use of automatic telephone dialing systems;

(C)

the use of artificial or prerecorded voice messages; or

(D)

the making of telephone solicitations.

(2) State use of databases

If, pursuant to subsection (c)(3), the Commission requires the establishment of a single national database of telephone numbers of subscribers who object to receiving telephone solicitations, a State or local authority may not, in its regulation of telephone solicitations, require the use of any database, list, or listing system that does not include the part of such single national database that relates to such State.

(g) Actions by States
(1) Authority of States

Whenever the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency designated by a State, has reason to believe that any person has engaged or is engaging in a pattern or practice of telephone calls or other transmissions to residents of that State in violation of this section or the regulations prescribed under this section, the State may bring a civil action on behalf of its residents to enjoin such calls, an action to recover for actual monetary loss or receive $500 in damages for each violation, or both such actions. If the court finds the defendant willfully or knowingly violated such regulations, the court may, in its discretion, increase the amount of the award to an amount equal to not more than 3 times the amount available under the preceding sentence.

(2) Exclusive jurisdiction of Federal courts

The district courts of the United States, the United States courts of any territory, and the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all civil actions brought under this subsection. Upon proper application, such courts shall also have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, or orders affording like relief, commanding the defendant to comply with the provisions of this section or regulations prescribed under this section, including the requirement that the defendant take such action as is necessary to remove the danger of such violation. Upon a proper showing, a permanent or temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.

(3) Rights of Commission

The State shall serve prior written notice of any such civil action upon the Commission and provide the Commission with a copy of its complaint, except in any case where such prior notice is not feasible, in which case the State shall serve such notice immediately upon instituting such action. The Commission shall have the right (A) to intervene in the action, (B) upon so intervening, to be heard on all matters arising therein, and (C) to file petitions for appeal.

(4) Venue; service of process

Any civil action brought under this subsection in a district court of the United States may be brought in the district wherein the defendant is found or is an inhabitant or transacts business or wherein the violation occurred or is occurring, and process in such cases may be served in any district in which the defendant is an inhabitant or where the defendant may be found.

(5) Investigatory powers

For purposes of bringing any civil action under this subsection, nothing in this section shall prevent the attorney general of a State, or an official or agency designated by a State, from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general or such official by the laws of such State to conduct investigations or to administer oaths or affirmations or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence.

(6) Effect on State court proceedings

Nothing contained in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit an authorized State official from proceeding in State court on the basis of an alleged violation of any general civil or criminal statute of such State.

(7) Limitation

Whenever the Commission has instituted a civil action for violation of regulations prescribed under this section, no State may, during the pendency of such action instituted by the Commission, subsequently institute a civil action against any defendant named in the Commission’s complaint for any violation as alleged in the Commission’s complaint.

(8) “Attorney general” defined

As used in this subsection, the term “attorney general” means the chief legal officer of a State.

(h) Annual report to Congress on robocalls and transmission of misleading or inaccurate caller identification information
(1) Report required

Not later than 1 year after December 30, 2019, and annually thereafter, the Commission, after consultation with the Federal Trade Commission, shall submit to Congress a report regarding enforcement by the Commission of subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) during the preceding calendar year.

(2) Matters for inclusion

Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A)

The number of complaints received by the Commission during each of the preceding 5 calendar years, for each of the following categories:

(i)

Complaints alleging that a consumer received a call in violation of subsection (b) or (c).

(ii)

Complaints alleging that a consumer received a call in violation of the standards prescribed under subsection (d).

(iii)

Complaints alleging that a consumer received a call in connection with which misleading or inaccurate caller identification information was transmitted in violation of subsection (e).

(B)

The number of citations issued by the Commission pursuant to section 503(b) of this title during the preceding calendar year to enforce subsection (d), and details of each such citation.

(C)

The number of notices of apparent liability issued by the Commission pursuant to section 503(b) of this title during the preceding calendar year to enforce subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e), and details of each such notice including any proposed forfeiture amount.

(D)

The number of final orders imposing forfeiture penalties issued pursuant to section 503(b) of this title during the preceding calendar year to enforce such subsections, and details of each such order including the forfeiture imposed.

(E)

The amount of forfeiture penalties or criminal fines collected, during the preceding calendar year, by the Commission or the Attorney General for violations of such subsections, and details of each case in which such a forfeiture penalty or criminal fine was collected.

(F)

Proposals for reducing the number of calls made in violation of such subsections.

(G)

An analysis of the contribution by providers of interconnected VoIP service and non-interconnected VoIP service that discount high-volume, unlawful, short-duration calls to the total number of calls made in violation of such subsections, and recommendations on how to address such contribution in order to decrease the total number of calls made in violation of such subsections.

(3) No additional reporting required

The Commission shall prepare the report required by paragraph (1) without requiring the provision of additional information from providers of telecommunications service or voice service (as defined in section 227b(a) of this title).

(i) Information sharing
(1) In general

Not later than 18 months after December 30, 2019, the Commission shall prescribe regulations to establish a process that streamlines the ways in which a private entity may voluntarily share with the Commission information relating to—

(A)

a call made or a text message sent in violation of subsection (b); or

(B)

a call or text message for which misleading or inaccurate caller identification information was caused to be transmitted in violation of subsection (e).

(2) Text message defined

In this subsection, the term “text message” has the meaning given such term in subsection (e)(8).

(j) Robocall blocking service
(1) In general

Not later than 1 year after December 30, 2019, the Commission shall take a final agency action to ensure the robocall blocking services provided on an opt-out or opt-in basis pursuant to the Declaratory Ruling of the Commission in the matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls (CG Docket No. 17–59; FCC 19–51; adopted on June 6, 2019)—

(A)

are provided with transparency and effective redress options for both—

(i)

consumers; and

(ii)

callers; and 2

(B)

are provided with no additional line item charge to consumers and no additional charge to callers for resolving complaints related to erroneously blocked calls; and

(C)

make all reasonable efforts to avoid blocking emergency public safety calls.

(2) Text message defined

In this subsection, the term “text message” has the meaning given such term in subsection (e)(8).

Source credit: (June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title II, § 227, as added Pub. L. 102–243, § 3(a), Dec. 20, 1991, 105 Stat. 2395; amended Pub. L. 102–556, title IV, § 402, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4194; Pub. L. 103–414, title III, § 303(a)(11), (12), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4294; Pub. L. 108–187, § 12, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2717; Pub. L. 109–21, §§ 2(a)–(g), 3, July 9, 2005, 119 Stat. 359–362; Pub. L. 111–331, § 2, Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3572; Pub. L. 114–74, title III, § 301(a), Nov. 2, 2015, 129 Stat. 588; Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title IV, § 402(i)(3), title V, § 503(a)(1)–(4)(A), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1089, 1091, 1092; Pub. L. 116–105, §§ 3(a), 8(a), 10(a), (b), Dec. 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 3274, 3283, 3284.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1934Enacted · Pub. L. 102-243 · 105 Stat. 2395
  • 1992Amended · Pub. L. 102-556 · 106 Stat. 4194
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-414 · 108 Stat. 4294
  • 2003Amended · Pub. L. 108-187 · 117 Stat. 2717
  • 2005Amended · Pub. L. 109-21 · 119 Stat. 359
  • 2010Amended · Pub. L. 111-331 · 124 Stat. 3572
  • 2015Amended · Pub. L. 114-74 · 129 Stat. 588
  • 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-141 · 132 Stat. 1089, 1091, 1092
  • 2019Amended · Pub. L. 116-105 · 133 Stat. 3274, 3283, 3284

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-243 on 1934-06-19.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case