10 U.S.C. § 130d — Treatment under Freedom of Information Act of certain confidential information shared with State and local personnel

submitted 20 years ago by Pub. L. 109-364 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 71 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Confidential business and unclassified homeland security information the Defense Department shares with state and local officials stays protected. Sharing it under this homeland security law doesn't make it subject to a public records request.

Confidential business information, and other sensitive but unclassified homeland security information, that the Department of Defense holds and shares with state and local personnel — under section 892 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 — does not become subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (section 552 of title 5) just because it was shared with those state and local personnel.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Confidential business information and other sensitive but unclassified homeland security information in the possession of the Department of Defense that is shared, pursuant to section 892 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 482), with State and local personnel (as defined in such section) shall not be subject to disclosure under section 552 of title 5 by virtue of the sharing of such information with such personnel.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title XIV, § 1405(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2436.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

2006Enacted · Pub. L. 109-364 · 120 Stat. 2436

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-364 on 2006-10-17.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case