10 U.S.C. § 233 — Operation and maintenance budget presentation
submitted 22 years ago by Pub. L. 108-375 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 221 words · no verdicts yet
When the President's defense budget requests a different amount than what was appropriated for an operation-and-maintenance item, the supporting documents must show both the current appropriated amount and the difference. The Navy's documents must separately identify amounts for ship depot maintenance and intermediate ship maintenance.
In any case in which the amount requested in the President’s budget for a fiscal year for a Department of Defense operation and maintenance program, project, or activity is different from the amount appropriated for that program, project, or activity for the current year, the O&M justification documents supporting that budget shall identify that appropriated amount and the difference between that amount and the amount requested in the budget, stated as an amount and as a percentage.
In the O&M justification documents for the Navy for any fiscal year, amounts requested for ship depot maintenance and amounts requested for intermediate ship maintenance shall be identified and distinguished.
In this section:
The term “O&M justification documents” means Department of Defense budget justification documents with respect to accounts for operation and maintenance submitted to the congressional defense committees* in support of the Department of Defense component of the President’s budget for any fiscal year.
The term “President’s budget” means the budget of the President submitted to Congress under section 1105 of title 31 for any fiscal year.
The term “current year” means the fiscal year during which the President’s budget is submitted in any year.
Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title X, § 1003(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2035.)
- 2004Enacted · Pub. L. 108-375 · 118 Stat. 2035
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-375 on 2004-10-28.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case