ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 3067Approval required for military department termination or reduction in participation in joint acquisition programs

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 116-283 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 159 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

A translation hasn’t been published for this section yet. The official text below is complete and authoritative.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Approval of Terminations and Reductions of Joint Acquisition Programs.—

The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations that prohibit each military department participating in a joint acquisition program approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment from terminating or substantially reducing its participation in such program without the approval of the Under Secretary.

(b)Required Content of Regulations.—

The regulations shall include the following provisions:

(1)

A requirement that, before any such termination or substantial reduction in participation is approved, the proposed termination or reduction be reviewed by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council of the Department of Defense.

(2)

A provision that authorizes the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to require a military department whose participation in a joint acquisition program has been approved for termination or substantial reduction to continue to provide some or all of the funding necessary for the acquisition program to be continued in an efficient manner.

Source credit: (Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1807(d)(2)(B), (E), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4158.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2021Enacted · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 4158

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-283 on 2021-01-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case