10 U.S.C. § 3371 — Undefinitized contractual actions: required description of anticipated effect on military department requirements if use of undefinitized contractual action results in delay

submitted 5 years ago by Pub. L. 116-283 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 64 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section bars an agency head from approving an undefinitized contractual action unless the request describes the expected effect of a delay on the concerned military department’s requirements.

The head of an agency may not enter into an undefinitized contractual action unless the request to the head of the agency for authorization of the contractual action includes a description of the anticipated effect on requirements of the military department concerned if a delay is incurred for determining contractual terms, specifications, and price before performance is begun under the contractual action.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

The head of an agency may not enter into an undefinitized contractual action unless the request to the head of the agency for authorization of the contractual action includes a description of the anticipated effect on requirements of the military department concerned if a delay is incurred for purposes of determining contractual terms, specifications, and price before performance is begun under the contractual action.

Source credit: (Added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1819(a), (b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4189.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

2021Enacted · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 4189

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-283 on 2021-01-01.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case