ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 488Management and review of electromagnetic spectrum

submitted 23 years ago by Pub. L. 108-136 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 294 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary of Defense must manage the electromagnetic spectrum the Department of Defense uses. This includes setting up an ongoing review process that involves every spectrum user in decisions about sharing or moving spectrum. At least every two years, the Secretary and the Joint Chiefs Chairman must jointly report to Congress on spectrum policy plans and risks.

(a) Organization. The Secretary of Defense must ensure the effective organization and management of the electromagnetic spectrum the Department uses, and must establish an enduring review-and-evaluation process. That process must consider all requirements relating to the spectrum, and must make sure every user of the spectrum — regardless of how classified their use is — is involved in the Department's decision-making about potentially sharing, reassigning, reallocating, or relocating its spectrum use. (b) Reports. (1) As often as the Secretary and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff determine is useful for effectively overseeing the Department's access to the electromagnetic spectrum — but not less often than every two years — they must jointly submit a report to the congressional defense committees. The report covers national policy plans and their implications for that access, in bands identified for study for possible reallocation, or under consideration for possible reallocation, by the Policy and Plans Steering Group the National Telecommunications and Information Administration established. (2) Each report must address, for the spectrum the report covers, how the Department's missions would be affected by sharing, reassigning, reallocating, or relocating its spectrum use, but only where the Secretary and Chairman jointly determine that doing so would: (A) potentially cause a loss of essential military capability to the Department's missions, as determined through feasibility assessments meant to ensure a comparable capability; or (B) likely not be possible within the ten years after the report's date.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Organization.—

The Secretary of Defense shall—

(1)

ensure the effective organization and management of the electromagnetic spectrum used by the Department of Defense; and

(2)

establish an enduring review and evaluation process that—

(A)

considers all requirements relating to such spectrum; and

(B)

ensures that all users of such spectrum, regardless of the classification of such uses, are involved in the decision-making process of the Department concerning the potential sharing, reassigning, or reallocating of such spectrum, or the relocation of the uses by the Department of such spectrum.

(b)Reports.—
(1)

From time to time as the Secretary and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff determine useful for the effective oversight of the access by the Department to electromagnetic spectrum, but not less frequently than every two years, the Secretary and the Chairman shall jointly submit to the congressional defense committees a report on national policy plans regarding implications for such access in bands identified for study for potential reallocation, or under consideration for potential reallocation, by the Policy and Plans Steering Group established by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.

(2)

Each report under paragraph (1) shall address, with respect to the electromagnetic spectrum used by the Department that is covered by the report, the implications to the missions of the Department resulting from sharing, reassigning, or reallocating the spectrum, or relocating the uses by the Department of such spectrum, if the Secretary and the Chairman jointly determine that such sharing, reassigning, reallocating, or relocation—

(A)

would potentially create a loss of essential military capability to the missions of the Department, as determined under feasibility assessments to ensure comparable capability; or

(B)

would not likely be possible within the 10-year period beginning on the date of the report.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, § 1054(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1615; amended Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title X, § 1072(a), (b)(1), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 868, 869; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title X, § 1071(f)(7), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3510; Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title X, § 1065(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2409.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2003Enacted · Pub. L. 108-136 · 117 Stat. 1615
  • 2013Amended · Pub. L. 113-66 · 127 Stat. 868, 869
  • 2014Amended · Pub. L. 113-291 · 128 Stat. 3510
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-328 · 130 Stat. 2409

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 108-136 on 2003-11-24.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case