ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 850Art. 50. Admissibility of sworn testimony from records of courts of inquiry

submitted 70 years ago by ch. 1041 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 241 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section allows certain sworn testimony from an authenticated court-of-inquiry record to be used in military proceedings when the witness cannot testify orally. It limits use in capital and officer-dismissal cases to the defense.

(a) In a noncapital case that does not allow dismissal of a commissioned officer, any party may read in evidence sworn testimony in an authenticated court-of-inquiry record if the witness’s oral testimony cannot be obtained, the testimony otherwise meets the evidence rules, the accused was a party to the inquiry, and the same issue was involved or the accused consents. This does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A. (b) In a capital case or a case allowing dismissal of a commissioned officer, only the defense may read such testimony in evidence. (c) The testimony may also be read before a court of inquiry or military board. (d) Sworn testimony recorded by audiotape, videotape, or a similar method and contained in an authenticated court-of-inquiry record is admissible before a court-martial, military commission, court of inquiry, or military board to the same extent as testimony may be read under subsections (a), (b), or (c).
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Use as Evidence by Any Party.—

In any case not capital and not extending to the dismissal of a commissioned officer, the sworn testimony, contained in the duly authenticated record of proceedings of a court of inquiry, of a person whose oral testimony cannot be obtained, may, if otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence, be read in evidence by any party before a court-martial or military commission if the accused was a party before the court of inquiry and if the same issue was involved or if the accused consents to the introduction of such evidence. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

(b)Use as Evidence by Defense.—

Such testimony may be read in evidence only by the defense in capital cases or cases extending to the dismissal of a commissioned officer.

(c)Use in Courts of Inquiry and Military Boards.—

Such testimony may also be read in evidence before a court of inquiry or a military board.

(d)Audiotape or Videotape.—

Sworn testimony that—

(1)

is recorded by audiotape, videotape, or similar method; and

(2)

is contained in the duly authenticated record of proceedings of a court of inquiry;

is admissible before a court-martial, military commission, court of inquiry, or military board, to the same extent as sworn testimony may be read in evidence before any such body under subsection (a), (b), or (c).

Source credit: (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 54; Pub. L. 109–366, § 4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, § 5232, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2915.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1956Enacted · Act of Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041
  • 2006Amended · Pub. L. 109-366 · 120 Stat. 2631
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-328 · 130 Stat. 2915

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 1041 on 1956-08-10.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case