ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

10 U.S.C. § 850aArt. 50a. Defense of lack of mental responsibility

submitted 40 years ago by Pub. L. 99-661 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 298 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section creates a defense when severe mental disease or defect kept the accused from understanding the nature, quality, or wrongfulness of the acts. It assigns the burden of proof and specifies the possible findings.

(a) In a court-martial, it is an affirmative defense that, when committing the acts constituting the offense, the accused’s severe mental disease or defect made the accused unable to appreciate the acts’ nature and quality or their wrongfulness. Mental disease or defect is not otherwise a defense. (b) The accused must prove lack of mental responsibility by clear and convincing evidence. (c) When the defense is properly at issue, the military judge must instruct the court members about it and require them to find the accused (1) guilty, (2) not guilty, or (3) not guilty only because of lack of mental responsibility. (d) Subsection (c) does not apply when only a military judge makes up the court-martial. In that situation, when the defense is properly at issue, the military judge must find the accused guilty, not guilty, or not guilty only because of lack of mental responsibility. (e) Despite article 52, the accused must be found not guilty only because of lack of mental responsibility if (1) a majority of the members present when the vote is taken decides the defense was established, or (2) in a judge-only court-martial, the military judge decides it was established.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)

It is an affirmative defense in a trial by court-martial that, at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the accused, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of the acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense.

(b)

The accused has the burden of proving the defense of lack of mental responsibility by clear and convincing evidence.

(c)

Whenever lack of mental responsibility of the accused with respect to an offense is properly at issue, the military judge shall instruct the members of the court as to the defense of lack of mental responsibility under this section and charge them to find the accused—

(1)

guilty;

(2)

not guilty; or

(3)

not guilty only by reason of lack of mental responsibility.

(d)

Subsection (c) does not apply to a court-martial composed of a military judge only. In the case of a court-martial composed of a military judge only, whenever lack of mental responsibility of the accused with respect to an offense is properly at issue, the military judge shall find the accused—

(1)

guilty;

(2)

not guilty; or

(3)

not guilty only by reason of lack of mental responsibility.

(e)

Notwithstanding the provisions of section 852 of this title (article 52), the accused shall be found not guilty only by reason of lack of mental responsibility if—

(1)

a majority of the members of the court-martial present at the time the vote is taken determines that the defense of lack of mental responsibility has been established; or

(2)

in the case of a court-martial composed of a military judge only, the military judge determines that the defense of lack of mental responsibility has been established.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VIII, § 802(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3905; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LVII, § 5233, Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2915.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1986Enacted · Pub. L. 99-661 · 100 Stat. 3905
  • 2016Amended · Pub. L. 114-328 · 130 Stat. 2915

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 99-661 on 1986-11-14.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case