16 U.S.C. § 410ww–2 — Park general management plan
submitted 34 years ago by Pub. L. 102-419 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 107 words · no verdicts yet
The Secretary of the Interior must write and send Congress a general management plan for Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park within three full fiscal years of October 16, 1992. The plan must consider the preservation and development plan from the Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission. It must also identify chances for the Secretary to partner with other governments and private groups.
(a) In general: Not later than 3 complete fiscal years after October 16, 1992, the Secretary, with the Commission's advice, must prepare and send Congress a general management plan for the park, covering at least what section 100502 of title 54 requires, and taking into account the preservation and development plan created under section 410ww–22 of this title.
(b) Park partnerships: The management plan must identify chances for the Secretary to partner with other federal, state, and local governments and the private sector, for developing, using, and interpreting properties within the park.
Not later than 3 complete fiscal years after October 16, 1992, the Secretary, with the advice of the Commission, shall prepare and submit to the Congress a general management plan for the park which includes but is not limited to the information described in section 100502 of title 54, and which takes into account the preservation and development plan developed under section 410ww–22 of this title.
The management plan shall identify partnership opportunities between the Secretary and other Federal, State, and local governments and the private sector for the development, use, and interpretation of properties within the park.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 102–419, title I, § 103, Oct. 16, 1992, 106 Stat. 2142.)
- 1992Enacted · Pub. L. 102-419 · 106 Stat. 2142
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 102-419 on 1992-10-16.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case