16 U.S.C. § 460s–6 — Taxing power

submitted 60 years ago by Pub. L. 89-668 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 41 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This law confirms that Michigan can still tax any real estate interest that a former owner kept under section 460s-10's retained-use-and-occupancy rules. Creating the lakeshore does not remove the state's normal taxing power over those retained interests.

Nothing in this subchapter stops Michigan's government from taxing any interest in real estate that an owner kept under section 460s–10. In other words, if a former landowner retained the right to live on or use property inside the lakeshore, Michigan may still tax that retained interest just as it would any other real estate interest.

the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed as prohibiting governmental jurisdiction in the State of Michigan from assessing taxes upon any interest in real estate retained under the provisions of section 460s–10 of this title to the owner of such interest.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 89–668, § 7, Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 923.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit

1966Enacted · Pub. L. 89-668 · 80 Stat. 923

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 89-668 on 1966-10-15.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

no arguments yet — make the first case