ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 460xx–5Report to Congress

submitted 38 years ago by Pub. L. 100-696 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 83 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Secretary must report to two congressional committees on how the San Pedro conservation area is being run. The first report was due within five years, and a new one is due every ten years after that. Each report must describe the area's resources and BLM's progress.

No later than five years after November 18, 1988, and every ten years after that, the Secretary must send a report to the House Committee on Natural Resources and the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. The report must cover how this subchapter is being carried out. It must include a detailed account of the condition of the conservation area's resources, and of how much progress the Bureau of Land Management has made toward this subchapter's purposes.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

No later than five years after November 18, 1988, and every ten years thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate, on the implementation of this subchapter. Such report shall include a detailed statement on the condition of the resources within the conservation area and of the progress of the Bureau of Land Management in achieving the purposes of this subchapter.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 100–696, title I, § 106, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4573; Pub. L. 103–437, § 6(d)(22), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4584.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1988Enacted · Pub. L. 100-696 · 102 Stat. 4573
  • 1994Amended · Pub. L. 103-437 · 108 Stat. 4584

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 100-696 on 1988-11-18.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case