ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

16 U.S.C. § 823dAlternative conditions and prescriptions

submitted 106 years ago by Pub. L. 109-58 to r/title-16-CONSERVATION · 949 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section lets license applicants propose cheaper or more effective alternatives to certain reservation conditions and fishways. It requires agency explanations and allows nonbinding dispute advice.

(a)(1) When a person applies for a license for works in a United States reservation and the responsible Secretary considers a condition necessary under section 797(e), the applicant or another proceeding party may propose an alternative. (2) The Secretary must accept it, and the Commission must put it in the license, if substantial evidence shows that it adequately protects and uses the reservation and, compared with the original condition, either costs significantly less or improves electricity operation. (3) The Secretary must consider record evidence from parties and the Commission about implementation costs and electricity-operation effects. (4) With each original or accepted alternative condition, the Secretary must place in the Commission record a written explanation of the basis and of why alternatives were rejected. It must show equal consideration of effects on energy supply, distribution, cost, and use; flood control; navigation; water supply; air quality; and other environmental quality. The Secretary must also submit relevant available studies, data, and facts. (5) If the Commission finds the final condition inconsistent with this subchapter or other law, it may refer the dispute to the Commission’s Dispute Resolution Service. The Service must consult the Secretary and Commission and issue nonbinding advice within 90 days. The Secretary may accept it unless it would inadequately protect the reservation, and must put the advice and final written decision in the record. (b)(1) When Interior or Commerce prescribes a fishway under section 811, the applicant or another party may propose an alternative to construct, maintain, or operate it. (2) The appropriate Secretary must accept and prescribe the alternative, and the Commission must require it, if substantial evidence shows it is at least as protective and either costs significantly less or improves electricity operation. (3) The Secretary must consider record evidence about cost and operational effects. (4) The Secretary must record the basis for the prescription and rejection of alternatives, show equal consideration of energy, flood control, navigation, water, air quality, and environmental effects, and submit relevant studies, data, and facts. (5) A dispute may be referred to the Dispute Resolution Service, which gives nonbinding advice within 90 days after consulting the agencies. The Secretary may accept it unless it would inadequately protect fish resources, and must record it and the final decision.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Alternative conditions
(1)

Whenever any person applies for a license for any project works within any reservation of the United States, and the Secretary of the department under whose supervision such reservation falls (referred to in this subsection as the “Secretary”) deems a condition to such license to be necessary under the first proviso of section 797(e) of this title, the license applicant or any other party to the license proceeding may propose an alternative condition.

(2)

Notwithstanding the first proviso of section 797(e) of this title, the Secretary shall accept the proposed alternative condition referred to in paragraph (1), and the Commission shall include in the license such alternative condition, if the Secretary determines, based on substantial evidence provided by the license applicant, any other party to the proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary, that such alternative condition—

(A)

provides for the adequate protection and utilization of the reservation; and

(B)

will either, as compared to the condition initially by the Secretary—

(i)

cost significantly less to implement; or

(ii)

result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production.

(3)

In making a determination under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall consider evidence provided for the record by any party to a licensing proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary, including any evidence provided by the Commission, on the implementation costs or operational impacts for electricity production of a proposed alternative.

(4)

The Secretary concerned shall submit into the public record of the Commission proceeding with any condition under section 797(e) of this title or alternative condition it accepts under this section, a written statement explaining the basis for such condition, and reason for not accepting any alternative condition under this section. The written statement must demonstrate that the Secretary gave equal consideration to the effects of the condition adopted and alternatives not accepted on energy supply, distribution, cost, and use; flood control; navigation; water supply; and air quality (in addition to the preservation of other aspects of environmental quality); based on such information as may be available to the Secretary, including information voluntarily provided in a timely manner by the applicant and others. The Secretary shall also submit, together with the aforementioned written statement, all studies, data, and other factual information available to the Secretary and relevant to the Secretary’s decision.

(5)

If the Commission finds that the Secretary’s final condition would be inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter, or other applicable law, the Commission may refer the dispute to the Commission’s Dispute Resolution Service. The Dispute Resolution Service shall consult with the Secretary and the Commission and issue a non-binding advisory within 90 days. The Secretary may accept the Dispute Resolution Service advisory unless the Secretary finds that the recommendation will not adequately protect the reservation. The Secretary shall submit the advisory and the Secretary’s final written determination into the record of the Commission’s proceeding.

(b) Alternative prescriptions
(1)

Whenever the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce prescribes a fishway under section 811 of this title, the license applicant or any other party to the license proceeding may propose an alternative to such prescription to construct, maintain, or operate a fishway.

(2)

Notwithstanding section 811 of this title, the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate, shall accept and prescribe, and the Commission shall require, the proposed alternative referred to in paragraph (1), if the Secretary of the appropriate department determines, based on substantial evidence provided by the license applicant, any other party to the proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary, that such alternative—

(A)

will be no less protective than the fishway initially prescribed by the Secretary; and

(B)

will either, as compared to the fishway initially prescribed by the Secretary—

(i)

cost significantly less to implement; or

(ii)

result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production.

(3)

In making a determination under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall consider evidence provided for the record by any party to a licensing proceeding, or otherwise available to the Secretary, including any evidence provided by the Commission, on the implementation costs or operational impacts for electricity production of a proposed alternative.

(4)

The Secretary concerned shall submit into the public record of the Commission proceeding with any prescription under section 811 of this title or alternative prescription it accepts under this section, a written statement explaining the basis for such prescription, and reason for not accepting any alternative prescription under this section. The written statement must demonstrate that the Secretary gave equal consideration to the effects of the prescription adopted and alternatives not accepted on energy supply, distribution, cost, and use; flood control; navigation; water supply; and air quality (in addition to the preservation of other aspects of environmental quality); based on such information as may be available to the Secretary, including information voluntarily provided in a timely manner by the applicant and others. The Secretary shall also submit, together with the aforementioned written statement, all studies, data, and other factual information available to the Secretary and relevant to the Secretary’s decision.

(5)

If the Commission finds that the Secretary’s final prescription would be inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter, or other applicable law, the Commission may refer the dispute to the Commission’s Dispute Resolution Service. The Dispute Resolution Service shall consult with the Secretary and the Commission and issue a non-binding advisory within 90 days. The Secretary may accept the Dispute Resolution Service advisory unless the Secretary finds that the recommendation will not adequately protect the fish resources. The Secretary shall submit the advisory and the Secretary’s final written determination into the record of the Commission’s proceeding.

Source credit: (June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. I, § 33, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title II, § 241(c), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 675.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1920Enacted · Pub. L. 109-58 · 119 Stat. 675

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 109-58 on 1920-06-10.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case