ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

34 U.S.C. § 12623Standards and best practices for use of non-invasive and non-permanent tracking devices

submitted 8 years ago by Pub. L. 115-141 to r/title-34-CRIME-CONTROL-AND-LAW-ENFORCEMENT · 693 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The Attorney General must set standards for non-invasive tracking devices used to find missing individuals. These standards cover who qualifies, who can access the data, privacy safeguards, and civil rights protections. Grant recipients must follow these standards, and no federal database of tracking data may be built.

(a) Setting the standards. (1) In general. Within 180 days of March 23, 2018, the Attorney General — consulting the Secretary of Health and Human Services and leading research, advocacy, self-advocacy, and service organizations — must set standards and best practices for using non-invasive, non-permanent tracking devices. These apply when a guardian or parent has decided such a device is the least restrictive way to locate someone described in section 12621(a)(2). (2) What the standards must cover. The Attorney General must: (A) decide (i) who would benefit from a tracking device, (ii) who should have direct access to the tracking system, and (iii) which non-invasive, non-permanent device types comply; and (B) set standards and best practices needed to run a tracking system, including procedures to: (i) protect the data's privacy — limiting access to law enforcement and health agencies the Attorney General decides need it, and collecting, using, and keeping the data only to prevent injury or death to the person wearing it; (ii) set criteria for deciding a tracking device is the least restrictive option to prevent injury or death, including considering less restrictive alternatives first; (iii) train law enforcement to recognize signs of abuse when dealing with device applicants; (iv) protect the civil rights and liberties of device users, including their Fourth Amendment rights and rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (v) set up a complaint and investigation process for grant recipients who don't follow the best practices or other law, and for cases where a device is used despite the person's objection; and (vi) decide what role state agencies should play in running a tracking system. (3) Effective date. These standards take effect 90 days after the Attorney General publishes them. (b) Following the standards. (1) In general. Any entity that gets a grant under section 12621(a)(2) must follow the tracking-device standards the Attorney General sets under (a). (2) Checking compliance. The Attorney General, consulting the Secretary of Health and Human Services, decides whether a grantee is actually following the standards in (1). (c) Where the standards apply. These standards only apply to the grant programs authorized under section 12621(a)(2). (d) Limits on the program. (1) No database. Tracking data from devices issued under this program can't be used by a federal agency to build a database. (2) Voluntary. Nothing here requires a parent or guardian to use a tracking device on a child or adult they supervise, if they don't believe it's necessary or in that person's interest.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) Establishment
(1) In general

Not later than 180 days after March 23, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and leading research, advocacy, self-advocacy, and service organizations, shall establish standards and best practices relating to the use of non-invasive and non-permanent tracking technology, where a guardian or parent has determined that a non-invasive and non-permanent tracking device is the least restrictive alternative, to locate individuals as described in subsection (a)(2) of section 12621 of this title, as added by this Act.

(2) Requirements

In establishing the standards and best practices required under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall—

(A)

determine—

(i)

the criteria used to determine which individuals would benefit from the use of a tracking device;

(ii)

the criteria used to determine who should have direct access to the tracking system; and

(iii)

which non-invasive and non-permanent types of tracking devices can be used in compliance with the standards and best practices; and

(B)

establish standards and best practices the Attorney General determines are necessary to the administration of a tracking system, including procedures to—

(i)

safeguard the privacy of the data used by the tracking device such that—

(I)

access to the data is restricted to law enforcement and health agencies determined necessary by the Attorney General; and

(II)

collection, use, and retention of the data is solely for the purpose of preventing injury to or death of the individual wearing the tracking device;

(ii)

establish criteria to determine whether use of the tracking device is the least restrictive alternative in order to prevent risk of injury or death before issuing the tracking device, including the previous consideration of less restrictive alternatives;

(iii)

provide training for law enforcement agencies to recognize signs of abuse during interactions with applicants for tracking devices;

(iv)

protect the civil rights and liberties of the individuals who use tracking devices, including their rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.);

(v)

establish a complaint and investigation process to address—

(I)

incidents of noncompliance by recipients of grants under subsection (a)(2) of section 12621 of this title, as added by this Act, with the best practices established by the Attorney General or other applicable law; and

(II)

use of a tracking device over the objection of an individual; and

(vi)

determine the role that State agencies should have in the administration of a tracking system.

(3) Effective date

The standards and best practices established pursuant to paragraph (1) shall take effect 90 days after publication of such standards and practices by the Attorney General.

(b) Required compliance
(1) In general

Each entity that receives a grant under subsection (a)(2) of section 12621 of this title, as added by this Act, shall comply with any standards and best practices relating to the use of tracking devices established by the Attorney General in accordance with subsection (a).

(2) Determination of compliance

The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall determine whether an entity that receives a grant under subsection (a)(2) of section 12621 of this title, as added by this Act, acts in compliance with the standards and best practices described in paragraph (1).

(c) Applicability of standards and best practices

The standards and best practices established by the Attorney General under subsection (a) shall apply only to the grant programs authorized under subsection (a)(2) of section 12621 of this title, as added by this Act.

(d) Limitations on program
(1) Data storage

Any tracking data provided by tracking devices issued under this program may not be used by a Federal entity to create a database.

(2) Voluntary participation

Nothing in this Act may be construed to require that a parent or guardian use a tracking device to monitor the location of a child or adult under that parent or guardian’s supervision if the parent or guardian does not believe that the use of such device is necessary or in the interest of the child or adult under supervision.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 115–141, div. Q, title III, § 302, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1121.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2018Enacted · Pub. L. 115-141 · 132 Stat. 1121

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 115-141 on 2018-03-23.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case