ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

47 U.S.C. § 227b–1Access to number resources

submitted 7 years ago by Pub. L. 116-105 to r/title-47-TELECOMMUNICATIONS · 258 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

The FCC must study whether tightening the rules for getting phone numbers — including requiring registration and customer identity checks — would help keep scammers from getting numbers used for illegal robocalls. Anyone who knowingly helps someone break those new rules can face an FCC financial penalty.

This section addresses how phone numbers are handed out, to make it harder for robocall scammers to get them. (a) In general. Paragraph (1): Within 180 days after December 30, 2019, the FCC must start a proceeding to study whether its current policies on giving out phone numbers — including toll-free and regular numbers — should change. That could include creating registration and compliance rules, and requiring providers who get access to numbers to take real steps to know who their customers are, all aimed at reducing the number of illegal robocallers (violators of section 227(b)) who can get phone numbers. Paragraph (2): If the FCC decides those policy changes would help reach that goal, it must write regulations putting the changes into effect. (b) Enforcement authority. If someone knowingly helps obtain phone numbers — including toll-free numbers — from a regulated common carrier in violation of the FCC's new rules under subsection (a), whether they act directly, through an employee or agent, or by any other means, they can be hit with an FCC financial penalty under the standard forfeiture process, even though a normal exemption in that process wouldn't otherwise apply. This penalty comes on top of any other penalty the law already allows.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a) In general
(1) Examination of FCC policies

Not later than 180 days after December 30, 2019, the Commission shall commence a proceeding to determine how Commission policies regarding access to number resources, including number resources for toll-free and non-toll-free telephone numbers, could be modified, including by establishing registration and compliance obligations, and requirements that providers of voice service given access to number resources take sufficient steps to know the identity of the customers of such providers, to help reduce access to numbers by potential perpetrators of violations of section 227(b) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(b)).

(2) Regulations

If the Commission determines under paragraph (1) that modifying the policies described in that paragraph could help achieve the goal described in that paragraph, the Commission shall prescribe regulations to implement those policy modifications.

(b) Authority

Any person who knowingly, through an employee, agent, officer, or otherwise, directly or indirectly, by or through any means or device whatsoever, is a party to obtaining number resources, including number resources for toll-free and non-toll-free telephone numbers, from a common carrier regulated under title II of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), in violation of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a), shall, notwithstanding section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5)), be subject to a forfeiture penalty under section 503(b) of that Act (47 U.S.C. 503(b)). A forfeiture penalty under this subsection shall be in addition to any other penalty provided for by law.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 116–105, § 6, Dec. 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 3282.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 2019Enacted · Pub. L. 116-105 · 133 Stat. 3282

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 116-105 on 2019-12-30.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case