ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 24309Retaining and maintaining facilities

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 729 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

This section stops rail carriers from downgrading or getting rid of facilities Amtrak uses. A carrier must notify Amtrak first, and the Secretary of Transportation must approve any downgrade or disposal. Amtrak may have to pay the carrier's avoidable costs to keep a facility running.

(a) Definitions — This section defines two terms. A "facility" is a rail line, right of way, fixed equipment, or related real property — things like signal systems, passenger stations, repair tracks, station buildings, platforms, and connected water, fuel, steam, electric, and air lines. "Downgrading" a facility means lowering its official track-safety classification, or changing it in a way that would slow down rail passenger service on that route. (b) Approval Required for Downgrading or Disposal — If Amtrak used a facility to provide passenger rail service on February 1, 1979, or on January 1, 1997, the carrier or authority that owns it can only downgrade or get rid of it after the Secretary of Transportation approves, following the steps in this section. (c) Notification and Analysis — (1) If a carrier plans to downgrade or dispose of a facility Amtrak isn't currently using, it must tell Amtrak. If Amtrak and the carrier don't agree within 60 days to keep or maintain the facility (or transfer it to Amtrak), the carrier can ask the Secretary for approval to downgrade or dispose of it. (2) Once notified, Amtrak must survey population centers served by rail facilities to help build a solid, up-to-date case for whether the facility is still needed, and must keep this survey data organized by region and by whether the route is short-haul or long-haul. The survey should look at: (A) ridership potential, based on current and changing travel patterns; (B) how good competing transportation is; (C) whether Amtrak could offer a competitive fare; (D) chances to target ads and fares to likely riders; (E) whether the route's economics make sense for short-haul or long-haul rail; and (F) whether better cost controls could improve the ratio of passenger revenue to expenses (not counting maintenance and depreciation). (d) Approval of Application and Payment of Avoidable Costs — (1) If Amtrak doesn't object within 30 days of the carrier's application, the Secretary must approve it quickly. (2) If Amtrak does object, the Secretary has 180 days to decide what costs the carrier could avoid by not having to keep the facility in the shape Amtrak wants. If Amtrak doesn't agree within 60 days after that decision to pay those avoidable costs, the Secretary must approve the carrier's application. In deciding whether to pay, Amtrak must weigh: (A) how important restoring service on that route could be; (B) the route's market potential; (C) whether other rail lines or transportation modes could serve the same area, and how efficient and available they are; (D) how many major population centers the route serves; (E) whether keeping the route would help expand the national rail passenger system; and (F) whether it could boost ridership on connecting rail lines. (e) Compliance With Other Obligations — Downgrading or disposing of a facility under this section doesn't free the carrier from any other legal duties — like common-carrier obligations — tied to that facility.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain
(a)Definitions.—

In this section—

(1)

“facility” means a rail line, right of way, fixed equipment, facility, or real property related to a rail line, right of way, fixed equipment, or facility, including a signal system, passenger station and repair tracks, a station building, a platform, and a related facility, including a water, fuel, steam, electric, and air line.

(2)

downgrading a facility means reducing a track classification as specified in the Federal Railroad Administration track safety standards or altering a facility so that the time required for rail passenger transportation to be provided over the route on which a facility is located may be increased.

(b)Approval Required for Downgrading or Disposal.—

A facility of a rail carrier or regional transportation authority that Amtrak used to provide rail passenger transportation on February 1, 1979, or on January 1, 1997, may be downgraded or disposed of only after approval by the Secretary of Transportation under this section.

(c)Notification and Analysis.—
(1)

A rail carrier intending to downgrade or dispose of a facility Amtrak currently is not using to provide transportation shall notify Amtrak of its intention. If, not later than 60 days after Amtrak receives the notice, Amtrak and the carrier do not agree to retain or maintain the facility or to convey an interest in the facility to Amtrak, the carrier may apply to the Secretary for approval to downgrade or dispose of the facility.

(2)

After a rail carrier notifies Amtrak of its intention to downgrade or dispose of a facility, Amtrak shall survey population centers with rail passenger transportation facilities to assist in preparing a valid and timely analysis of the need for the facility and shall update the survey as appropriate. Amtrak also shall maintain a system for collecting information gathered in the survey. The system shall collect the information based on geographic regions and on whether the facility would be part of a short haul or long haul route. The survey should facilitate an analysis of—

(A)

ridership potential by ascertaining existing and changing travel patterns that would provide maximum efficient rail passenger transportation;

(B)

the quality of transportation of competitors or likely competitors;

(C)

the likelihood of Amtrak offering transportation at a competitive fare;

(D)

opportunities to target advertising and fares to potential classes of riders;

(E)

economic characteristics of rail passenger transportation related to the facility and the extent to which the characteristics are consistent with sound economic principles of short haul or long haul rail transportation; and

(F)

the feasibility of applying effective internal cost controls to the facility and route served by the facility to improve the ratio of passenger revenue to transportation expenses (excluding maintenance of tracks, structures, and equipment and depreciation).

(d)Approval of Application and Payment of Avoidable Costs.—
(1)

If Amtrak does not object to an application not later than 30 days after it is submitted, the Secretary shall approve the application promptly.

(2)

If Amtrak objects to an application, the Secretary shall decide by not later than 180 days after the objection those costs the rail carrier may avoid if it does not have to retain or maintain a facility in the condition Amtrak requests. If Amtrak does not agree by not later than 60 days after the decision to pay the carrier these avoidable costs, the Secretary shall approve the application. When deciding whether to pay a carrier the avoidable costs of retaining or maintaining a facility, Amtrak shall consider—

(A)

the potential importance of restoring rail passenger transportation on the route on which the facility is located;

(B)

the market potential of the route;

(C)

the availability, adequacy, and energy efficiency of an alternate rail line or alternate mode of transportation to provide passenger transportation to or near the places that would be served by the route;

(D)

the extent to which major population centers would be served by the route;

(E)

the extent to which providing transportation over the route would encourage the expansion of an intercity rail passenger system in the United States; and

(F)

the possibility of increased ridership on a rail line that connects with the route.

(e)Compliance With Other Obligations.—

Downgrading or disposing of a facility under this section does not relieve a rail carrier from complying with its other common carrier or legal obligations related to the facility.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 913; Pub. L. 105–134, title I, § 162, Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2578.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 913
  • 1997Amended · Pub. L. 105-134 · 111 Stat. 2578

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case