51 U.S.C. § 70506 — Exploration technology research
submitted 16 years ago by Pub. L. 111-314 to r/title-51-NATIONAL-AND-COMMERCIAL-SPACE-PROGRAMS · 116 words · no verdicts yet
This section addresses exploration technology research. It sets the rules stated in the explanation.
The Administrator* must carry out a program of long-term exploration-related technology research and development. It may include in-space propulsion, power systems, life support, and advanced avionics, and it must not be tied to specific flight projects. The program’s funding goal must be to ensure that the technology research and development can be completed in a timely way to support safe, successful, and sustainable exploration of the solar system. To capture the broadest range of innovative concepts and technologies, the long-term technology program must have the goal of making a significant portion of its funding available for external grants and contracts with universities, research institutions, and industry.
The Administrator* shall carry out a program of long-term exploration-related technology research and development, including such things as in-space propulsion, power systems, life support, and advanced avionics, that is not tied to specific flight projects. The program shall have the funding goal of ensuring that the technology research and development can be completed in a timely manner in order to support the safe, successful, and sustainable exploration of the solar system. In addition, in order to ensure that the broadest range of innovative concepts and technologies are captured, the long-term technology program shall have the goal of having a significant portion of its funding available for external grants and contracts with universities, research institutions, and industry.
Source credit: (Pub. L. 111–314, § 3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3431.)
- 2010Enacted · Pub. L. 111-314 · 124 Stat. 3431
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 111-314 on 2010-12-18.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case