10 U.S.C. § 7452 — Cadets: hazing
submitted 70 years ago by ch. 1041 to r/title-10-ARMED-FORCES · 141 words · no verdicts yet
West Point must make rules that define hazing and punish it. A cadet facing dismissal for hazing can demand a court-martial trial instead. A cadet dismissed for hazing cannot return or become an officer for two years.
Subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Army*, the Superintendent of the Academy shall issue regulations—
defining hazing;
designed to prevent that practice; and
prescribing dismissal, suspension, or other adequate punishment for violations.
If a cadet who is charged with violating a regulation issued under subsection (a), the penalty for which is or may be dismissal from the Academy, requests in writing a trial by a general court-martial, he may not be dismissed for that offense except under sentence of such a court.
A cadet dismissed from the Academy for hazing may not be reappointed to the Corps of Cadets, and is ineligible for appointment as a commissioned officer* in a regular component of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or Space Force, until two years after the graduation of his class.
Source credit: (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 244, § 4352; renumbered § 7452, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, § 808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, § 924(c)(1)(A), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3826.)
- 1956Enacted · Act of Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041
- 2018Amended · Pub. L. 115-232 · 132 Stat. 1839
- 2021Amended · Pub. L. 116-283 · 134 Stat. 3826
A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by ch. 1041 on 1956-08-10.
all 0 arguments · sorted by: best
no arguments yet — make the first case