ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 49101Findings

submitted 29 years ago by Pub. L. 105-102 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 413 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress found that Washington's two federally owned airports are vital to the region's economy and transportation. It found that local, independent control would let both airports keep up with growing air travel demand. It found that a long-term lease to a local authority was the right way to hand over control.

Congress made 10 findings. (1) The 2 federally owned airports in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area are an important, growing part of the commerce, transportation, and economy of Virginia, D.C., and the surrounding region. (2) Baltimore/Washington International Airport, owned and run by Maryland, serves the same greater region alongside the 2 federal airports, and timely federal grants to it will add capacity and let it compete fairly with other airports. (3) The U.S. government has a continuing but limited interest in running the 2 federal airports, which serve the travel and cargo needs of the whole Metropolitan Washington region and D.C. as the seat of government. (4) Having an independent local authority run the Metropolitan Washington Airports will let improvements happen faster to meet growing interstate air travel demand caused by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. (5) Every other major U.S. air carrier airport is run by a public entity at the state, regional, or local level. (6) Any change in the 2 airports' status must consider the interests of nearby communities, the traveling public, air carriers, general aviation, airport employees, other interested groups, and the U.S. and state governments involved. (7) Given a perceived limited need for a federal role in managing these airports, and growing local interest, the Secretary of Transportation has recommended transferring authority from the federal to the local/state level, matching how major airports elsewhere in the U.S. are run. (8) An operating authority with representation from local jurisdictions, like the authorities at other major U.S. airports, will improve communication with local officials and residents about noise at the Metropolitan Washington Airports. (9) A commission of congressional, state, and local officials and aviation representatives recommended to the Secretary that the federally owned airports be transferred as one unit to an independent authority created by Virginia and D.C. (10) The federal interest in these airports can be protected through a lease that still allows local control and operation.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Congress finds that—

(1)

the 2 federally owned airports in the metropolitan area of the District of Columbia constitute an important and growing part of the commerce, transportation, and economic patterns of Virginia, the District of Columbia, and the surrounding region;

(2)

Baltimore/Washington International Airport, owned and operated by Maryland, is an air transportation facility that provides service to the greater Metropolitan Washington region together with the 2 federally owned airports, and timely Federal-aid grants to Baltimore/Washington International Airport will provide additional capacity to meet the growing air traffic needs and to compete with other airports on a fair basis;

(3)

the United States Government has a continuing but limited interest in the operation of the 2 federally owned airports, which serve the travel and cargo needs of the entire Metropolitan Washington region as well as the District of Columbia as the national seat of government;

(4)

operation of the Metropolitan Washington Airports by an independent local authority will facilitate timely improvements at both airports to meet the growing demand of interstate air transportation occasioned by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (Public Law 95–504; 92 Stat. 1705);

(5)

all other major air carrier airports in the United States are operated by public entities at the State, regional, or local level;

(6)

any change in status of the 2 airports must take into account the interest of nearby communities, the traveling public, air carriers, general aviation, airport employees, and other interested groups, as well as the interests of the United States Government and State governments involved;

(7)

in recognition of a perceived limited need for a Federal role in the management of these airports and the growing local interest, the Secretary of Transportation has recommended a transfer of authority from the Federal to the local/State level that is consistent with the management of major airports elsewhere in the United States;

(8)

an operating authority with representation from local jurisdictions, similar to authorities at all major airports in the United States, will improve communications with local officials and concerned residents regarding noise at the Metropolitan Washington Airports;

(9)

a commission of congressional, State, and local officials and aviation representatives has recommended to the Secretary that transfer of the federally owned airports be as a unit to an independent authority to be created by Virginia and the District of Columbia; and

(10)

the Federal interest in these airports can be provided through a lease mechanism which provides for local control and operation.

Source credit: (Added Pub. L. 105–102, § 2(26), Nov. 20, 1997, 111 Stat. 2206.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1997Enacted · Pub. L. 105-102 · 111 Stat. 2206

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 105-102 on 1997-11-20.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case