ALLcrimesfood&drugstaxestelecomcommercehealthconservationtransportationagricultureveteransbrowse all titles »
0

49 U.S.C. § 47521Findings

submitted 32 years ago by Pub. L. 103-272 to r/title-49-TRANSPORTATION · 177 words · no verdicts yet

in plain englishAI-generated · not legal advice

Congress states that aviation noise must be managed at the national level, even though local noise concerns matter too, because scattered local restrictions could hurt the national air system. New technology and revenue — including passenger facility charges — can ease noise worries. Before an airport can collect a passenger facility charge, the Secretary of Transportation must first set procedures for reviewing noise and access restrictions on older and newer aircraft.

Congress finds that (1) managing aviation noise is crucial to continuing to grow airport capacity; (2) community noise concerns have led to uncoordinated and inconsistent restrictions on aviation that could impede the national air transportation system; (3) a noise policy must be carried out at the national level; (4) local interest in aviation noise management must be considered when determining the national interest; (5) community concerns can be eased through new-technology aircraft and revenue, including passenger facility charges, used for noise management; (6) revenue controlled by the United States Government can help solve noise problems and carries with it a responsibility to the national airport system; (7) revenue from a passenger facility charge may be applied to noise management and increased airport capacity; and (8) before a passenger facility charge can be established and collected, the Secretary of Transportation must first prescribe a regulation setting procedures for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on the operation of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft.
the actual law source: uscode.house.gov ↗public domain

Congress finds that—

(1)

aviation noise management is crucial to the continued increase in airport capacity;

(2)

community noise concerns have led to uncoordinated and inconsistent restrictions on aviation that could impede the national air transportation system;

(3)

a noise policy must be carried out at the national level;

(4)

local interest in aviation noise management shall be considered in determining the national interest;

(5)

community concerns can be alleviated through the use of new technology aircraft and the use of revenues, including those available from passenger facility charges, for noise management;

(6)

revenues controlled by the United States Government can help resolve noise problems and carry with them a responsibility to the national airport system;

(7)

revenues derived from a passenger facility charge may be applied to noise management and increased airport capacity; and

(8)

a precondition to the establishment and collection of a passenger facility charge is the prescribing by the Secretary of Transportation of a regulation establishing procedures for reviewing airport noise and access restrictions on operations of stage 2 and stage 3 aircraft.

Source credit: (Pub. L. 103–272, § 1(e), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1287; Pub. L. 112–95, title I, § 111(c)(2)(A)(vi), (B), Feb. 14, 2012, 126 Stat. 18.)

history & why it existsrecord from the source credit
  • 1994Enacted · Pub. L. 103-272 · 108 Stat. 1287
  • 2012Amended · Pub. L. 112-95 · 126 Stat. 18

A history note hasn’t been published yet. The record shows enactment by Pub. L. 103-272 on 1994-07-05.

all 0 arguments · sorted by: best

0/280

no arguments yet — make the first case